Behrens v. Baldenecker

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtRUDOLPH
CitationBehrens v. Baldenecker, 76 S.D. 327, 77 N.W.2d 917 (S.D. 1956)
Decision Date27 July 1956
Docket NumberNo. 9575,9575
PartiesSylvia May BEHRENS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Florence L. BALDENECKER and Helen L. Tolby, Defendants and Respondents.

Henry C. Mundt and Acie W. Matthews, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff-appellant.

John Carl Mundt, Sioux Falls, for defendants-respondents.

RUDOLPH, Judge.

This action was commenced for the purpose of quieting title to a certain residence property located in the city of Sioux Falls. By agreement of the parties this property was sold for $13,000 and the proceeds thereof are now held by a third party awaiting the outcome of this action. Following the sale of the property an amended complaint was served and filed seeking to quiet title in the plaintiff to the proceeds of the sale under the provisions of SDC 37.16. The trial court dismissed the action and plaintiff has appealed.

The facts are as follows: The plaintiff and defendants are sisters. In 1945 the plaintiff purchased certain real property in Omaha, Nebraska. At the time of the purchase her mother, Mary L. Hanson, who was then living with her, advanced to the plaintiff $5,750, the major part of the purchase price, and title to the Omaha property was taken in the name of plaintiff and her mother as joint tenants. The Omaha property was subsequently sold and the money derived therefrom was used to purchase the Sioux Falls property, title to which was again taken in the name of plaintiff and her mother as joint tenants. The mother died in March 1947 and thereafter proceedings were had to terminate the life estate of the mother in the Sioux Falls property. The mother left a will wherein she left her property in equal shares to plaintiff and defendants. In April 1947 this plaintiff filed a petition in the county court of Minnehaha county praying for admission to probate of the last will of her mother. In this petition she listed as an asset of the estate an interest in the Sioux Falls residence property valued at $5,750. Plaintiff was appointed executrix of the will. In her final account and petition for distribution she listed among the assets of the estate 'Amount due from Sylvia May Behrens by reason of the interest which Mary L. Hanson had in the North 64 1/2 feet of the Northeast quarter of Block 14, Sherman's Addition to Sioux Falls according to the recorded plat thereof situated in Minnehaha County, South Dakota and subject to deed with a survivorship clause to Sylvia May Behrens amounting to $5750.00.' In the final decree in the mother's estate the property of the estate, so far as here material, was described as follows:

'Amount due from Sylvia May Behrens by reason of the interest which Mary L. Hanson had in the North 64 1/2 feet of NE 1/4 of Block 14, Sherman's Addition to Sioux Falls, S. D. according to recorded plat thereof, in Minnehaha County, S. D. and subject to deed with a survivorship clause to Sylvia May Behrens in which life estate has been terminated and title is now vested in Sylvia May Behrens, amounting to $5750.00 (Sylvia May Behrens agrees to pay to Florence L Baldenecker and Helen L Tolby each a one third of said $5750.00 upon the sale of the aforesaid property, less one half of the loss if any, when sale is made of the property in question, each to share one half of said one half loss if any).'

The property was distributed by the county court one-third each to the plaintiff and the two defendants as provided in the will.

Following the mother's death the three sisters had a discussion relating to the mother's property. In this discussion plaintiff acknowledged that her mother had advanced $5,750 when the Omaha property was purchased and that the three sisters should share equally in this amount under the terms of the will. Such was the substance of the trial court's findings under disputed testimony. Following this discussion plaintiff acknowledged defendants' interest in the money advanced by the mother to purchase the property by a written statement as follows:

'Statement

'To Florence L Baldenecker, Des Moines, Iowa, and Helen L Tolby, Tolleson, Arizona. This is to certify that Mary L Moody Hanson had an interest in the North sixty four and one half feet (N 64 1/2 ft) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) in Block Fourteen (14) Sherman's Addition to Sioux Falls, according to the recorded plat thereof, situate in the County of Minnehaha, State of South Dakota, in the amount of Fifty eight hundred and fifty dollars ($5850.00), and,

'That the undersigned will pay a one third (1/3) of said amount to each of the above named parties upon the sale of said property, less one half (1/2) of the loss, if any, when sale is made of the property in question, each to share a one half (1/2) of said one half (1/2) loss, if any.

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Finley v. Kesling
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 18, 1982
    ...cert. den. 90 N.M. 7, 558 P.2d [105 Ill.App.3d 9] 619, modified as to amount of award 90 N.M. 208, 561 P.2d 481; Behrens v. Baldenecker (1956), 76 S.D. 327, 77 N.W.2d 917; Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. Kobelinski (E.D.Pa.1976), 421 F.Supp. 431), or blowing "hot and cold" (Garden City Sand......
  • Allen v. Allen
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1976
    ...out the rule. In re Estate of Cohen, 1970, 105 Ariz. 337, 464 P.2d 620; Harrell v. Horton, Okl.1965, 401 P.2d 461; Behrens v. Baldenecker, 1956, 76 S.D. 327, 77 N.W.2d 917; Long v. Knox, 1956, 155 Tex. 581, 291 S.W.2d 292. For an extremely extensive and interesting discussion of the doctrin......
  • Burt v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank, C.A. No. PC/02-2243 (R.I. Super. 7/26/2006)
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Superior Court
    • July 26, 2006
    ...unfair advantage by asserting a position inconsistent with one previously espoused. Id. (citations omitted); see also Behrens v. Baldenecker, 77 N.W.2d 917, 919 (S.D. 1956) (judicial estoppel prevents a party from "playing fast and loose with the courts"). "Judicial estoppel is an equitable......
  • Harms v. Cigna Ins. Companies
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Dakota
    • March 13, 2006
    ...from "`playing fast and loose with the courts.'" State v. St. Cloud, 465 N.W.2d 177, 179 (S.D.1991) (quoting Behrens v. Baldenecker, 76 S.D. 327, 77 N.W.2d 917, 919 (1956)). Failure to list an accrued cause of action as an asset during bankruptcy proceedings can trigger judicial estoppel im......
  • Get Started for Free