Behunin v. Superior Court
| Docket Number | B272225 |
| Decision Date | 14 March 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Golden Door Props., LLC v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.
...be made to advance their shared interest in securing legal advice on that common matter." ’ " ( Behunin v. Superior Court (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 833, 853, 215 Cal.Rptr.3d 475.)When the common interest doctrine is asserted to prevent disclosure of shared information between a project applicant......
-
Ponzo v. Miller
...110 at p. 128.) Whether a party has waived the attorney-client privilege is often a mixed question of law and fact. (Behunin v. Superior Court (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 833, 843.) Ponzo, Dillon and Ivy Screen argued in the trial court that the communications were admissible because Crum raised g......
-
Golden Door Props., LLC v. Superior Court
...the communications be made to advance their shared interest in securing legal advice on that common matter." ' " (Behunin v. Superior Court (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 833, 853.) When the common interest doctrine is asserted to prevent disclosure of shared information between a project applicant a......
-
Golden Door Props., LLC v. Superior Court
...the communications be made to advance their shared interest in securing legal advice on that common matter." ' " (Behunin v. Superior Court (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 833, 853.) When the common interest doctrine is asserted to prevent disclosure of shared information between a project applicant a......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 4 - §4. Attorney-client privilege
...Evid. C. §952; People v. Rhoades (2019) 8 Cal.5th 393, 410; Uber Techs., 27 Cal.App.5th at 966; Behunin v. Superior Ct. (2d Dist.2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 833, 849-50; see, e.g., People v. Superior Ct. (Smith) (2018) 6 Cal.5th 457, 472 (confidential records shared among prosecution team, includin......
-
Table of cases
...§§9:130, 9:150, 9:160 Behr v. Redmond (2011) 193 Cal. App. 4th 517, 123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 97, §22:200 Behunin v. Superior Court (2017) 9 Cal. App. 5th 833, 215 Cal. Rptr. 3d 475, §10:70 Belcher, People v. (1961) 189 Cal. App. 2d 404, 11 Cal. Rptr. 175, §7:130 Belfiore-Braman v. Rotenberg (2018)......
-
Discovery
...(N.D. Ill. 2005)(same); Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 200 F.R.D. 661, 669 (D. Kan. 2001). See also Behunin v. Superior Court , 9 Cal. App. 5th 833, 849-50, 215 Cal. Rptr. 3d 475 (2017) review denied (June 14, 2017)(“There may be situations in which an attorney’s use of a public relat......
-
Table of Cases null
...Beck v. State of Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 85 S. Ct. 223, 13 L. Ed. 2d 142 (1964)—Ch. 5-A, §2.2.3(1)(a) Behunin v. Superior Court, 9 Cal. App. 5th 833, 215 Cal. Rptr. 3d 475 (2d Dist. 2017)—Ch. 4-C, §4.2.2(2) Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 122 S. Ct. 1843, 152 L. Ed. 2d 914 (2002)—Ch. 5-D, §2.1.1 Bel......
Request a trial to view additional results