Bell v. Kaiser

Decision Date31 March 1872
CitationBell v. Kaiser, 50 Mo. 150 (Mo. 1872)
PartiesHAMILTON BELL, Respondent, v. JOHN P. KAISER, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

Mauro & Laughlin, for respondent.

S. N. Holliday, for appellant.

WAGNER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover commissions for selling defendant's real estate. The petition stated that, through the instrumentality of plaintiff and his exertions in that behalf, defendant's house and lot were sold for a certain amount, and commissions at the usual and ordinary rate were demanded. The answer did not deny that the house and lot were sold for the sum specified in the petition, but denied that defendant employed plaintiff to sell the same, and denied that plaintiff did make the sale. There was a trial before a jury, and verdict and judgment for plaintiff.

The court, for the plaintiff, instructed the jury that if they believed from the evidence that the defendant employed plaintiff to sell the house and lot in question for him, and that plaintiff was a real estate agent, and that by his advertisements and exertions he procured a purchaser for the house and lot, to whom the same was sold, then plaintiff was entitled to recover from defendant the usual and ordinary commissions for effecting the sale.

Defendant asked for an instruction to the effect that if the jury believed from the evidence that the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
73 cases
  • Kyle v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 12, 1947
    ... ... 563; McCormack v. Henderson, ... 100 Mo.App. 647, 75 S.W. 171; Glade v. Eastern Ill. Min ... Co., 129 Mo.App. 443, 107 S.W. 1002; Bell v ... Kaiser, 50 Mo. 150; Hovey v. Aaron, 133 Mo.App ... 573, 113 S.W. 718; Lane v. Cunningham, 171 Mo.App ... 17, 153 S.W. 525; Stinde v ... ...
  • Matson & May v. Pearson
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 11, 1906
    ... ... make the sale; such is the ruling in this State. McCrory ... v. Kellogg (Mo.), 81 S.W. 466; Blaydes v ... Adams, 35 Mo.App. 526; Bell v. Kaiser, 50 Mo ... 150; Perrin v. Kimberlin, 85 S.W. 630 ...          Defendant ... cannot relieve himself of liability by refusal ... ...
  • Earls v. Alsup
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 6, 1944
    ...of the defendant, closed the deal with the defendant in the absence of and without the knowledge of the plaintiffs, is immaterial. [Bell v. Kaiser, 50 Mo. 150; v. Sills, 170 Mo.App. 555, 157 S.W. 93; Cole v. Crump. 174 Mo.App. 215, 156 S.W. 769; Ross v. Major, 178 Mo.App. 431, 163 S.W. 880;......
  • Higgins v. Kitterman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • July 30, 1958
    ...or not a broker is the procuring cause is ordinarily a question for the jury. Bowman v. Rahmoeller, 331 Mo. 868, 55 S.W.2d 453; Bell v. Kaiser, 50 Mo. 150; Studt v. Leiweke, Mo.App., 100 S.W.2d 30; Grether v. Di Franco, Mo.App., 178 S.W.2d 469; Earls v. Alsup, 237 Mo.App. 819, 176 S.W. 2d I......
  • Get Started for Free