Bell v. State
Decision Date | 09 September 1988 |
Citation | 535 So.2d 210 |
Parties | Ex parte State of Alabama. (In re: Gary Lamar BELL v. STATE of Alabama). 87-547. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Beth Slate Poe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Greg Ward, Lanett, for respondent.
We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to consider whether the defendant's Batson 1 objection was timely. The Court of Criminal Appeals, holding that it was, remanded the case for further proceedings. See Bell v. State, 535 So.2d 208 (Ala.Crim.App.1987). The record clearly shows, however, that the defendant's objection to the venire was made after the jury had been empaneled and sworn. The record reveals the following:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Phillips v. State (In re Phillips)
-
Cochran v. State, 6 Div. 726
...20] based upon any ground which could have been but was not raised on appeal." Rule 20.2(a)(5), A.R.Cr.P.Temp. See also Bell v. State, 535 So.2d 210 (Ala.1988). Relying principally on Reed v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1, 104 S.Ct. 2901, 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984), Cochran argues that he is not procedurally b......
-
Phillips v. State (Ex parte Phillips)
...526 So.2d at 622-23 (illustrating the types of evidence that can be used to raise an inference of discrimination). In Ex parte Bell, 535 So.2d 210, 212 (Ala. 1988), this Court stated that, "in order to preserve the issue for appellate review, a Batson objection, in a case in which the death......
-
Phillips v. State (In re Phillips)
...526 So. 2d at 622-23 (illustrating the types of evidence that can be used to raise an inference of discrimination). In Ex parte Bell, 535 So. 2d 210, 212 (Ala. 1988), this Court stated that, "in order to preserve the issue for appellate review, a Batson objection, in a case in which the dea......