Bell v. The Town of Sullivan
| Decision Date | 14 March 1902 |
| Docket Number | 19,767 |
| Citation | 63 N.E. 209,158 Ind. 199 |
| Parties | Bell v. The Town of Sullivan |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From Sullivan Circuit Court; W. W. Moffett, Judge.
Action by Frank Bell against the Town of Sullivan on account for wages as common laborer. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
O. B Harris, for appellant.
John S Bays and L. F. Bays, for appellee.
OPINION
This action was brought by the appellant against the appellee to recover the sum of $ 57.60, alleged to be due to him on account of "unskilled labor" performed by him on public works of said town of Sullivan. The answer was in five paragraphs, the first being a denial; the second, payment; the third, accord and satisfaction; the fourth, a set-off; and the fifth alleging a special contract between the appellant and the appellee whereby the compensation of the appellant was fixed at $ 1.10 per day for the of the appellant was fixed at $ 1.10 per day for the whole period of his employment. Demurrers to all the paragraphs of the answer except the first having been overruled, the cause was put at issue by a reply in denial, and was submitted to a jury for trial, who returned a general verdict for the appellee. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment was entered upon the verdict. The plaintiff below appeals, and the errors assigned and discussed are the rulings of the court on the demurrers to the third, fourth, and fifth paragraphs of the answer, and the refusal of the court to grant a new trial.
The claim of the appellant is founded upon the act of March 6, 1899, entitled "An act establishing a minimum wage rate on public work of State, counties, cities, and towns, and declaring an emergency." Acts 1899, p. 515. The first section of said act reads as follows: "Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana: That from and after the passage of this act, unskilled labor employed upon any public work of the State, counties, cities and towns shall receive not less than fifteen cents an hour for said labor."
The facts of the case, as shown by the pleadings and proof, were that the appellant was employed by the appellee, through its marshal and street commissioners from March 6, 1899, until August 20, 1899, a period of 144 days, of ten hours each, at an agreed rate of $ 1.10 per day. The work done by the appellant under this agreement consisted of unskilled labor on street improvements, and in cleaning and repairing the streets, alleys, and sidewalks of the town. He received his pay from time to time at the rate agreed upon, without objection, until the full amount due to him, agreeably to the terms of his contract, was paid to him, and duly receipted for. He then brought suit against the town for $ 57.60, on the ground that the minimum rate of wages which the town was permitted by the act of March 6, 1899, supra, to pay for unskilled labor was fifteen cents per hour, or $ 1.50 per day for a day of ten hours.
On these facts two questions are presented: (1) Is the act of March 6, 1899, which purports to fix the minimum rate of wages to be paid by towns for unskilled labor...
To continue reading
Request your trial