Bell v. United States

Decision Date04 February 1947
Docket NumberNo. 10432.,10432.
Citation159 F.2d 247
PartiesArthur L. BELL, George Gouverneur Ashwell, Eugene Wadsworth Brown, J. Fred Burkey, Lawrence Cook, A. Ray Elsea, Ed Gilson, Max-Theodore Miller, Bay Burns Sharp and Homer G. Wilcox, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Russell E. Parsons, A. L. Wirin, and Lorrin Andrews, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

James M. Carter, U. S. Atty., Norman W. Neukom, Asst. U. S. Atty., and William Strong, Sp. Asst. to U. S. Atty., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Osmond K. Fraenkel and Arthur Garfield Hays, both of New York City, for American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiæ.

En Banc.

PER CURIAM

Upon the authority of Ballard v. United States, 67 S.Ct. 261, the judgments appealed from in the above entitled case are reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Bell v. Hood
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 2 May 1947
    ... ...         This action was brought by Arthur L. Bell and other associates of "Mankind 71 F. Supp. 815 United", on behalf of that organization and themselves as individuals, against 37 special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, one policeman of ...         Federal jurisdiction was invoked on the ground that the action "arises under the Constitution or laws of the United States" within the meaning of § 24(1) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1), and the amount in controversy exceeds $3,000. Diversity of citizenship is ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT