Bellamy v. Morace Stevedoring Co., 594
Decision Date | 12 December 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 594,594 |
Citation | 258 N.C. 327,128 S.E.2d 395 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | Hiram Van BELLAMY, Employee, v. MORACE STEVEDORING COMPANY, Employer; Travelers Insurance Company, Carrier. |
Poisson, Marshall, Barnhill & Williams, by Lonnie B. Williams, Wilmington, for defendants-appellants.
Bowman & Prevatte, by James C. Bowman, Southport, for plaintiff-appellee.
The claimant testified as a witness in his own behalf:
On cross-examination, he testified:
Claimant was a carpenter, 65 years of age.The defendant's evidence indicated that the work of moving nets, etc., was usually done by longshoremen.However, this duty was sometimes assigned to carpenters.In moving a net, 'it is rolled similar to a barrel.'
The claimant's medical expert, a specialist in the field of 'heart conditions,' in response to a hypothetical question involving the effect of physical exertion, said: Dr. Tidler testified the claimant told him three men were helping him.
We conclude that so much of finding of fact No. 4 as relates to the heavy and strenuous lifting usually done by...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway Commission, 605
...of Pitt, 269 N.C. 577, 153 S.E.2d 67; Ferrell v. Montgomery & Aldridge Sales Co., 262 N.C. 76, 136 S.E.2d 227; Bellamy v. Morace Stevedoring Co., 258 N.C. 327, 128 S.E.2d 395; Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc., 240 N.C. 399, 82 S.E.2d When one is carrying on his usual work in the usua......
-
Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp., 463
... ... In Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co., 215 N.C. 308, 1 S.E.2d 818, it was held that the ... ...
-
Ferrell v. Montgomery & Aldridge Sales Co., 671
...232, 49 S.E.2d 398; and, especially, by Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc., 240 N.C. 399, 82 S.E.2d 410; and Bellamy v. Stevedoring Co., 258 N.C. 327, 128 S.E.2d 395. The case was fully developed before the Industrial Commission, well briefed, and ably argued here. We conclude, however......
-
Weaver v. Swedish Imports Maintenance, Inc.
...his injury and his employment by expert medical testimony. In support of this contention, defendants rely upon Bellamy v. Stevedoring Co., 258 N.C. 327, 128 S.E.2d 395 (1962) and Lewter v. Enterprises, Inc., 240 N.C. 399, 82 S.E.2d 410 (1954) and argue that Dr. Warburton's testimony failed ......