Bellmore Sales Corp. v. Winfield Drug Stores, Inc.
Decision Date | 09 August 1960 |
Parties | BELLMORE SALES CORP., Plaintiff, v. WINFIELD DRUG STORES, INC., Nicholas S. Gesoalde, New York State Pharmaceutical Assn., Inc., National Independent Pharmacists, Inc., John Doe and Richard Roe, Numbered 1 to 1,000, the names of Said Numbered Defendants being Fictitious, the True Names of Such Persons Being Unknown to Plaintiff, the Parties Intended being the Members of the Named Trade Association Engaging in the Conspiracy Herein Alleged, Chanel, Inc., Coty, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Parker Pen Company, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Morton L. Kimmelman, New York City, for plaintiff.
Rogers, Hoge & Hills, New York City, for Johnson & Johnson.
This is a motion under Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the complaint as to defendant, Johnson & Johnson, on the grounds that it fails to state a claim against defendant, Johnson & Johnson, upon which relief can be granted or, in the alternative, on the grounds that it recites a claim which should be properly raised as a compulsory counterclaim in a prior pending action under Rule 13(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Under the Federal rules it is the function of the pleadings to give fair notice of the asserted claim. The complaint in this action is sufficient to defeat this motion under Rule 12(b) (6).
Turning to the alternative part of the motion that the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed because it should have been raised as a compulsory counterclaim in a prior pending action by Johnson & Johnson against plaintiff, it must, likewise, be denied. Rule 13(a) of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
ACF Industries, Incorporated v. Guinn
...in the Texas infringement action as compulsory counterclaims under Rule 13(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. See Bellmore Sales Corporation v. Winfield Drug Stores, Inc., S.D.N.Y.1960, 187 F.Supp. 161, 162; Local Union 499 v. Iowa Power & Light Co., S.D.Iowa, 1964, 224 F.Supp. 731, 738; 1A Barron & Holtzoff......
-
Local U. 499 of Int. Bro. of Elec. Wkrs. v. Iowa Power & Light Co.
...counterclaim in a prior action, where such prior action is still pending and has not proceeded to judgment. Bellmore Sales Corp. v. Winfield Drug Stores, Inc., D.C., 187 F.Supp. 161. The defendants contend that the third-party contractors should be joined as indispensable parties. The facts......
-
Landers v. Smith
...28 U.S.C.A. Rule 13, p. 342; 3A Barron & Holtzoff, Fed.Practice & Proc., p. 439 (Rules Ed. 1958); Bellmore Sales Corp. v. Winfield Drug Stores, Inc., S.D.N.Y., 187 F.Supp. 161, 162[5, 6]; Wendell v. Holland-America Line, S.D.N.Y., 30 F.R.D. 162, 163-64; see also Douglas v. Wisconsin Alumni ......
-
Conopco, Inc. v. Roll Intern. Corp.
...Maddox Roof Serv., Inc., 362 So.2d 99, 100 (Fla.App.1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 1370 (Fla.1979); Bellmore Sales Corp. v. Winfield Drug Stores, Inc., 187 F.Supp. 161, 162 (S.D.N.Y.1960); see also Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & May Kay Kane, 6 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ.2d § 1418 (199......