Belluso v. Hall

CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtMcMURRAY; BANKE, C.J., and BENHAM
CitationBelluso v. Hall, 335 S.E.2d 884, 176 Ga.App. 281 (Ga. App. 1985)
Decision Date12 September 1985
Docket NumberNo. 70409,70409
PartiesBELLUSO et al. v. HALL.

Russell D. Waldon, Atlanta, for appellants.

Lloyd E. N. Hall, Atlanta, pro se.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Appellee, a practicing attorney, brought suit against appellants alleging they failed to pay his fees. Following a jury trial during which appellants represented themselves, a verdict was returned in favor of appellee. Judgment was entered upon the verdict and now through counsel this appeal was taken. Held:

Appellants' enumerations of error only address evidentiary matters. Assuming, arguendo, the trial court erred in admitting the evidence in question, such errors were waived by appellants' failure to interpose timely objections. Page v. State, 167 Ga.App. 297, 298(1), 306 S.E.2d 381.

Judgment affirmed.

BANKE, C.J., and BENHAM, J., concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • McCranie v. Langdale Ford Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 16, 1985
  • Morris v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 2, 1986
    ...be required to preserve error. This court will not consider an objection which was not raised in the trial court. Belluso v. Hall, 176 Ga.App. 281, 335 S.E.2d 884 (1985). 3. Appellant asserts as error the trial court's "contradictory rulings" on the admissibility of evidence of other teleph......