Ben v. Mississippi
| Docket Number | 2009-CT-01495-SCT |
| Decision Date | 23 August 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
30 cases
-
Galloway v. State
...cases, the “elephant in the room” is that the constitutional right to speedy trial in Mississippi is dead. Ben v. State, 95 So.3d 1236, 1258 (Miss.2012) (Dickinson, P.J., dissenting); Johnson, 68 So.3d at 1247 (Dickinson, P.J., dissenting).17 In this case, I would reverse the trial court's ......
-
Collins v. Comm'r, Miss. Dept. of Corr.
... ... I ... INTRODUCTION ... On ... January 11, 2018, petitioner Jairus Collins ... (“Collins”) filed a petition for a writ of habeas ... corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section ... 2254”), seeking for his state court felon-in-possession ... conviction to be set aside, his sentence vacated, and the ... charge dismissed. Doc. [1, 3]. Collins contends that he is ... unlawfully confined because his conviction and sentence were ... imposed in violation of the U.S. Constitution and laws ... ...
-
Eubanks v. State
...Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution affords an accused ‘the right to a speedy and public trial ....’ " Ben v. State , 95 So. 3d 1236, 1242 (Miss. 2012) (quoting U.S. Const. amend. VI ). "That right is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Am......
-
Newell v. State
...1008, 1012 (Miss.1991) ). For example, “ ‘well-taken’ motions for continuance may justify a delay in criminal cases.” Ben v. State, 95 So.3d 1236, 1243 (Miss.2012) (citing Flora v. State, 925 So.2d 797, 815 (Miss.2006) ). On the other hand, a bad motive on the prosecution's part significant......
Get Started for Free