Benites v. Hampton
Decision Date | 05 December 1887 |
Citation | 8 S.Ct. 254,31 L.Ed. 260,123 U.S. 519 |
Parties | BENITES v. HAMPTON |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
E. D. Hoge, for plaintiff in error.
S. Shellabarger and J. M. Wilson, for defendant in error.
Section 997 of the Revised Statutes is in these words: 'There shall be annexed to and returned with any writ of error for the removal of a cause, at the day and place therein mentioned, an authenticated transcript of the record, an assignment of errors, and a prayer for reversal, with a citation to the adverse party.' Rule 8, sec. 1, of this court is as follows: 'The clerk of the court to which any writ of error may be directed shall make return of the same, by transmitting a true copy of the record, and of the assignment of errors, under his hand and the seal of the court.' Rule 21 requires printed briefs to be filed, and section 2 of that rule provides that the brief shall contain, Sections 4 and 5 of the same rule are as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hanson v. C. B. & Q. R. R. Company
... ... cases other reasons are also stated for the court's ... action. ( Dugger v. Tayloe, 121 U.S. 286, 30 L.Ed ... 946, 7 S.Ct. 895; Benites v. Hampton, 123 U.S. 519, ... 31 L.Ed. [29 Wyo. 438] 260; Stevens v. Barbour, 140 ... U.S. 48, 35 L.Ed. 338, 11 S.Ct. 690; Rowe v. Phelps, ... ...
-
Gulf Coast Shippers Ltd. v. DHL Express (Usa), Inc.
...Utah May 8, 2001) (citing Hurd, 106 P.2d at 777). 164. DHL cites to Benites v. Hampton, 3 P. 206 (Utah Terr. 1884), appeal dismissed, 8 S. Ct. 254 (1887). In Benites, the Supreme Court for the Territory of Utah recognized that failure to object to a bill for a specific amount within a reaso......
-
Marshall v. Burtis
...of testimony, and there is no specification in the briefs, as required by rule 21. Lucas v. Brooks, 18 Wall. 436; Benites v. Hampton, 123 U. S. 519, 8 Sup. Ct. 254. Indeed, error on admitting testimony is not urged at all, and probably was not intended to be. The statement of counsel 'The e......
-
State v. Smith
... ... S.) 71; Ryan v. Koch, 17 Wall. (U. S.) ... 19; Treat v. Jamison, 20 Wall. (U. S.) 652; ... Dugger v. Tayloe, 121 U.S. 286, 7 S.Ct. 895; Benites ... v. Hampton, 123 U.S. 519, 8 S.Ct. 254.) ... QUARLES, ... J. Sullivan, C. J., and Huston, J., concur ... [5 ... ...