Benjamin Motor Express v. United States

Decision Date29 January 1958
Docket NumberNo. 5238.,5238.
PartiesBENJAMIN MOTOR EXPRESS, Inc., Defendant, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit

S. Roy Remar, Boston, Mass., with whom Max Singer, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellant.

Andrew A. Caffrey, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boston, Mass., with whom Anthony Julian, U. S. Atty., Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellant is a common carrier by motor vehicle which in 1944 and 1945 transported ammunition for the United States from its Naval Ammunition Depot in Hingham, Massachusetts, to its Naval Reservation at Price's Neck, Rhode Island. These transportation services were performed under a contract with the United States wherein the carrier agreed that the rates to be applied in computing its compensation were to be:

"Rates as found in tariffs: New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc., & Middle Atlantic States Motor Carrier Conference, Inc., but not to exceed the applicable railroad rates for the same quantity between the same points."

The defendant-appellant billed the United States for its services at the motor carrier rate and the United States pursuant to § 322 of the Transportation Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 955, 49 U.S.C.A. § 66, paid the bills on presentation. Later, however, upon audit by the General Accounting Office, it was determined that the substantially lower railroad rate applied and, the carrier disagreeing, the United States brought the instant suit to recover the amount of its alleged overpayments.

The District Court after trial found that although the naval installation on Price's Neck is about five miles by motor vehicle from the railroad freight station in Newport, Rhode Island, nevertheless Price's Neck is within the corporate limits of the City of Newport and is a part of that municipality. Then, construing the word "points" as meaning in transportation parlance the entire geographical area within the corporate limits of a city or town, it ruled that the plaintiff-appellant had agreed, perhaps improvidently, to provide motor carrier service from the Naval Ammunition Depot in Hingham to the Naval Reservation at Price's Neck for the same tariff that the railroad would charge for providing its more limited type of service from Hingham to Newport. Wherefore it entered the judgment for the United...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. Export Drum Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 6, 1966
    ...& Pac. R. R., 288 I.C.C. 107, 109 (1953); cf. United States v. Benjamin Motor Express, Inc., 147 F. Supp. 15 (D.Mass.1957), aff'd, 251 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 1958) (trucking A similarly broad definition of the phrase "shipping point" in the tariff under consideration here would be entirely cons......
  • Reisch Trucking and Transportation Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Comptroller General of the United States
    • October 1, 1965
    ...made under section 22 of the interstate commerce ACT. See united states v. Benjamin motor express, Inc., 147 F.Supp. 15 (1957), affirmed 251 F.2d 547, in which under section 22 motor carrier agreed to charge motor carrier rates but not to exceed the applicable railroad rate; see, also, unit......
  • Strickland Transportation Co., Inc., B-143469
    • United States
    • Comptroller General of the United States
    • March 14, 1963
    ... ... No. B-143469Comptroller General of the United StatesMarch 14, 1963 ... Further ... in the southern motor carriers rate conference, agent's ... freight tariff ... as amended, 49 U.S.C. 66. United States v. New york, new ... haven and hartford r.Co., 355 S. 253; benjamin motor ... express, Inc. v. United States, 251 F.2d ... ...
  • Union Pacific Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Comptroller General of the United States
    • January 22, 1964
    ... ... B-152805Comptroller General of the United StatesJanuary 22, 1964 ... Further ... U.S.C. 66. United States v. New york, new haven and hartford ... r.Co., 355 S. 253; benjamin motor express, Inc. v. United ... States, 251 F.2d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT