Benjamin v. Fairchild

Decision Date03 April 1928
Docket NumberNo. 62.,62.
CitationBenjamin v. Fairchild, 242 Mich. 274, 218 N.W. 663 (Mich. 1928)
PartiesBENJAMIN et al. v. FAIRCHILD et al.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Wayne County, in Chancery; Joseph H. Collins, Judge.

Suit by Agens Benjamin and others against Alice May Fairchild and others.From an adverse decree, plaintiffs appeal.Affirmed.

Argued before the Entire Bench, except FLANNIGAN, C. J.Yerkes, Simons & Goddard, of Detroit (C. Upton Shreve and Don M. Harlan, both of Detroit, of counsel), for appellants.

C. H. & G. M. Lehman, of Detroit, for appellees Fairchild and Smith.

Arthur E. Whipple, of Detroit, for appellees Bentley.

WIEST, J.

The bill herein was filed October 8, 1925, to set aside a final order of the probate court for the county of Wayne, made December 5, 1922, adjudging defendants Fairchild and Smith sole heirs at law of Andrew Turnbull, deceased, and assigning the estate to them.Plaintiffs claim that they are the heirs at law of Andrew Turnbull, deceased, and defendants Fairchild and Smith, while daughters of Turnbull, are illegitimate because their mother was never divorced from her first husband, Samuel L. Collins.The bill was dismissed on the ground that the order of the probate court was res adjudicata.Plaintiffs appealed and claim the petition for administration was false and fraudulent and, therefore, the probate court acquired no jurisdiction.No excuse is alleged or shown by plaintiffs for not appealing from the probate order if dissatisfied therewith.

Andrew Turnbull's wife was formerly Sarah Van Houghton, and in February, 1863, she was married to Samuel L. Collins.About three months after the marriage Collins deserted his wife, and a little later became a soldier in the Civil War and was not heard of again for nearly 50 years.One child was born of that marriage.In 1865, Sarah married Andrew Turnbull and lived with him until his death in 1896, a period of 31 years.Defendants Fairchild and Smith were born of that marriage.Samuel L. Collins died in 1918.After the death of Turnbull, Sarah married a Mr. Brown, with whom she lived but a short time when he died, and in April, 1921, she died.Andrew Turnbull, at his death, owned real estate then worth about $1,500.After the death of Sarah, and in April, 1921, defendant Fairchild applied for administration of the estate of her father and averred that she and her sisterSarah A. Garfield(now Smith) were the heirs at law of Andrew Turnbull.The usual probate proceedings were had.September 7, 1922, Agnes Benjamin, one of plaintiffs, filed a petition in the probate proceeding, alleging that defendants Fairchild and Smith were illegitimate children, that plaintiffs herein were the true heirs at law, and asked the probate court to determine the legal heirs of Andrew Turnbull entitled to inherit the real estate.We understand from the record that testimony was taken in the probate court.The probate court adjudged defendants Fairchild and Smith to be the only heirs at law of Andrew Turnbull, deceased, and assigned to them, in equal shares, the real estate.No appeal was taken from this adjudication.We are satisfied that ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Driver v. Union Indus. Trust & Sav. Bank
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1933
    ...515, 201 N. W. 530;Thompson v. Thompson, 229 Mich. 526, 201 N. W. 533;Raseman v. Raseman, 234 Mich. 237, 208 N. W. 35;Benjamin v. Fairchild, 242 Mich. 274, 218 N. W. 663. It is urged that a great injustice will be done to plaintiff if he be deprived of the property to which he would be enti......
  • Dunn v. Taylor (In re Taylor's Estate)
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1935
    ...515, 201 N. W. 530;Thompson v. Thompson, 229 Mich. 526, 201 N. W. 533;Raseman v. Reseman, 234 Mich. 237, 208 N. W. 35;Benjamin v. Fairchild, 242 Mich. 274, 218 N. W. 663;Driver v. Union Industrial Trust & Savings Bank, 264 Mich. 42, 249 N. W. 459. We find no error in the judgment of the tri......
  • Simon v. Cadillac Motorcar Co.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1928