Bennett v. Bennett

Decision Date01 May 1926
Docket Number5102
Citation208 N.W. 846,54 N.D. 86
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Lembke, J.

Appeal dismissed.

F. M. Jackson, for appellant.

Mark H. Amundson, for respondent.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and NUESSLE, BIRDZELL, BURKE, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the district court of Bowman county overruling an objection to the jurisdiction of the court and setting aside a special appearance by the defendant.

The action is an action for divorce. Service was attempted to be made by publication under the provisions of § 7428, Comp. Laws 1913. Defendant made a special appearance and objected to the jurisdiction of the district court of Bowman county on the ground that no proper service of summons had been had. Thereafter the district judge made an order overruling the objection to the jurisdiction of the court and setting aside the special appearance. This appeal is from such an order.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal. Section 7481, Comp. Laws 1913, enumerates the orders that are appealable. We think it plain that the order complained of by the defendant, and sought to be reviewed on this appeal, is not among those enumerated in this section. See Baird v. Lefor, 52 N.D. 155, 201 N.W. 997; Quarton v. O'Neil, 51 N.D. 842, 200 N.W. 1010, and cases cited; De Bord v. Brandt, 49 S.D. 173, 206 N.W. 925; Ryan v. Davenport, 5 S.D. 203, 58 N.W. 568.

The appeal must therefore be dismissed. It is so ordered.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and NUESSLE, BIRDZELL, BURKE, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT