Bennett v. Keehn

Decision Date02 September 1886
Citation67 Wis. 154,29 N.W. 207
PartiesBENNETT v. KEEHN, IMPLEADED, ETC.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Milwaukee county.D. G. Rogers and E. P. Smith, for respondent, Ezra F. Bennett.

J. C. McKenney, for appellant, Jennie W. Keehn, impleaded, etc.

BY THE COURT.

The judgment from which the appeal herein was taken, was entered May 10, 1884, and the appeal was perfected May 10, 1886. The respondent now moves that the appeal be dismissed for the alleged reason that it was not taken within two years from the date of the entry of judgment, as required by statute. Rev. St. 794, § 3039. The question is whether, in computing the time in which an appeal may be taken, the day the judgment was entered shall be excluded or included. If it be excluded, this appeal was taken in time; otherwise not. The question is not an open one in this court. In Supervisors of Milwaukee Co. v. Pabst, 64 Wis. 244,S. C. 25 N. W. Rep. 11, it was held that an appeal perfected June 15, 1885, from a judgment entered June 15, 1883, was in time. This ruling accords with the spirit of chapter 194, Laws 1879, if not within the letter of that statute. Were the question now presented for the first time, we should not hesitate to hold that the day of the entry of judgment should be excluded, and hence that this appeal was taken in time.

Motion denied, with $10 costs and clerk's fees.

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Fitzgerald v. Flanagan
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • April 10, 1912
    ...12 Metc. (Mass.) 175, 45 Am. Dec. 243;Sandwich Co. v. Zellmer, 48 Minn. 408, 51 N. W. 379; Freeman v. Foster, 55 Me. 508; Bennett v. Keehn, 67 Wis. 154, 29 N. W. 207, 30 N. W. 112. [7] In such cases, even though there be no assumption of the debt, the property is conveyed subject to the mor......
  • Ed. Fitzgerald v. Flanagan
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • April 10, 1912
    ... ... 175, 12 Met. 175 (45 Am ... Dec. 243); Sandwich Co. v. Zellmer, 48 Minn. 408 (51 ... N.W. 379); Freeman v. Foster , 55 Me. 508; ... Bennett v. Keehn , 67 Wis. 154 (29 N.W. 207, 30 N.W ...          In such ... cases, even though there be no assumption of the debt, the ... ...
  • Stewart v. Omaha Loan & Trust Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1920
    ... ... Isett v. Brewster, 17 Iowa 503; Terry v ... Warden, 77 N. W. (Minn.) 777; Schultz v. Bank, ... 30 N. E. (Ill.) 347; Horn v. Bennett, 34 N. E ... (Ind.) 956; Owings v. McKenzie, 133 Mo. 333; ... Campbell Co. v. Roeder, 44 Mo.App. 328; Rowe v ... Scherz, 69 Mo.App. 91; ... nothing more. 27 Cyc. 1361-b, note 30; Powers v ... Laffler, 73 Iowa 283, 34 N.W. 659; Bennett v ... Keehn, 67 Wis. 154, 30 N.W. 112; Calkins v ... Coply, 29 Minn. 471, 13 N.W. 904; Robinson Bank v ... Miller, 153 Ill. 244, 38 N.E. 1078. (b) The ... ...
  • Stewart v. Omaha Loan & Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1920
    ...41 Minn. 417, 43 N. W. 91; Calkins v. Copley, 29 Minn. 471, 13 N. W. 904; Boyer v. Price, 45 Wash. 667, 88 Pac. 1106; Bennett v. Keehn, 67 Wis. 154, 29 N. W. 207, 30 N. W. The exception in the covenants of warranty to the deeds of trust made by Cunningbam to G. P. Rodgers is subject to the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT