Benyarko v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.

Decision Date18 June 1990
Citation556 N.Y.S.2d 761,162 A.D.2d 572
PartiesGeorge V. BENYARKO, et al., Appellants, v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

S. Edmund Resciniti, Brooklyn (Thomas Torto, of counsel), for appellants.

Henry J. Cernitz, Garden City, for respondents.

Before THOMPSON, J.P., and BROWN, EIBER and MILLER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), entered March 24, 1989, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for an assessment of damages.

It is undisputed that while the plaintiff Yvonne C. Benyarko was stopped for a red light at an intersection, her automobile was struck in the rear by a vehicle owned by the defendant Avis Rent A Car System, Inc., and operated by the defendant Wesley H. Ford. In similar circumstances, this court previously held:

"When a rear-end collision occurs * * * such collision is sufficient to create a prima facie case of liability on the part of defendant and imposes a duty of explanation with respect to the operator of the offending vehicle * * * When a driver approaches another vehicle from the rear, he is bound to maintain a reasonably safe rate of speed and to maintain control of his vehicle and use reasonable care to avoid colliding with the other vehicle * * * [c]onclusory allegations * * * in opposition do not rebut the inference of negligence created by the unexplained rear-end collision" (Young v. City of New York, 113 A.D.2d 833, 833-834, 493 N.Y.S.2d 585; see also O'Callaghan v. Flitter, 112 A.D.2d 1030, 493 N.Y.S.2d 28).

The statements made by the defendant Ford in his affidavit in opposition to the effect that he saw cars waiting for a red light "half a block" ahead and that he applied his brakes but slid into the plaintiff driver's vehicle due to the wet roadway, are insufficient to rebut the inference of negligence and to raise a triable issue of fact as to liability (Young v. City of New York, supra; O'Callaghan v. Flitter, supra ). Moreover, the admission made by the defendant Ford in a signed "witness statement" accompanying the "Motor Vehicle Accident" report that he was driving in the rain at 40...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 cases
  • Collymore-Maynard v. Gayle-Lyken
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 13, 2023
    ... ... See Oberly v ... Bangs Ambulance, Inc., 96 N.Y.2d 295 [2001 ]; Candia ... v. Omonia Cab Corp., 6 ... organ, member, function or system. "Toure v Avis ... Rent A Car Systems Inc., 98 N.Y.2d 345, ... 226 A.D.2d 418, 641 N.Y.S.2d 71 [2d Dept 1996]; Benyarko ... v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 162 A.D.2d 572, 556 N.Y.S.2d ... ...
  • Sukhu v. Marajh, 2009 NY Slip Op 33227(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 11/9/2009)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 9, 2009
    ...taking into account the road conditions. See, Ortega v. City of New York, 281 A.D.2d 466 (2nd Dept. 2001); Benyarko v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc., 162 A.D.2d 572 (2nd Dept.1990). Accordingly, the motion for partial summary judgment is granted. A trial shall be held on the issue of damages......
  • Countermine v. Galka
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 28, 1993
    ...112 A.D.2d 264, 491 N.Y.S.2d 711; see also, DeAngelis v. Kirschner, 171 A.D.2d 593, 594, 567 N.Y.S.2d 457; Benyarko v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 162 A.D.2d 572, 573, 556 N.Y.S.2d 761; Daliendo v. Johnson, 147 A.D.2d 312, 321, 543 N.Y.S.2d 987; Silberman v. Surrey Cadillac Limousine Serv., 109 A......
  • Turnbull v. Powell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 17, 2012
    ...the inference of negligence and raise a triable issue of fact. Crociata, 168 A.D.2d at 410, 562 N.Y.S.2d 536;Benyarko v. Avis, 162 A.D.2d 572, 573, 556 N.Y.S.2d 761 (2nd Dept.,1990). An explanation that the plaintiff's vehicle came to an abrupt or sudden stop is insufficient to raise a ques......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Standards of Care for Motorists
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • April 1, 2015
    ...to the rear vehicle regardless of whether the lead vehicle (a) is stopped at a red light ( Benyarko v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. , 162 A.D.2d 572, 556 N.Y.S.2d 761 (2nd Dept. 1990)); (b) stops suddenly at a red light ( Hurley v. Cavitolo , 239 A.D.2d 559, 658 N.Y.S.2d 90 (2nd Dept. 1997)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT