Berg v. Bishop
| Decision Date | 31 October 1866 |
| Citation | 39 Mo. 356 |
| Parties | SAMUEL BERG, Appellant, v. E. W. BISHOP, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court.
Bland & Bland, and Garesche & Mead, for appellant.
E. Perry, and C. D. Drake, for respondent.
The respondent in this case moves the court to dismiss the appeal because the appellant has failed to assign errors according to law. The motion is sustained;
the other judges concurring.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Maxwell v. Andrew County
... ... by the trial court are not alleged: Thompson v ... Richardson, 12 Mo. 976; Berg v. Bishop, 39 Mo ... 356; Nevins v. Gilliland, 234 S.W. 818; Davis v ... Barada-Ghio Real Est. Co., 163 Mo.App. 328, 143 S.W ... 1108; ... ...
-
Seubert v. Fawick Tractor Co.
...judgment or decree, or a dismissal of the appeal.’ State v. Brown (Md.) 16 Atl. 722;McKinnon v. Atkins, 60 Mich. 418, 27 N. W. 564;Berg v. Bishop, 39 Mo. 356;Stanton v. Slabaugh (Mo.) 11 S. W. 577;McLeod v. Dickenson, 11 Mont. 438, 28 Pac. 551;McNeill v. Kyle, 86 Ala. 338, 5 South. 461;Glob......
-
Seubert v. Fawick Traction Co.
...judgment or decree, or a dismissal of the appeal.' State v. Brown (Md.) 16 Atl. 722; McKinnon v. Atkins, 60 Mich. 418, 27 N.W. 564; Berg v. Bishop, 39 Mo. 356; Stanton v. Slabaugh (Mo.) 11 S.W. 577, McLeod v. Dickenson, 11 Mont. 438, 28 Pac. 551; McNeill v. Kyle, 86 Ala. 338, 5 South. 461; ......
- Moore v. Harris
Request a trial to view additional results