Bergstol v. Town of Monroe

Decision Date05 May 2003
Citation305 A.D.2d 349,762 N.Y.S.2d 879
PartiesKENNETH BERGSTOL, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>TOWN OF MONROE, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Altman, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied.

It is axiomatic that this Court may take judicial notice of its own orders in related actions (see Lefkowitz v Lurie, 253 AD2d 855; Brandes Meat Corp. v Cromer, 146 AD2d 666). Accordingly, the respondent's motion to strike the appellant's brief or portions of the appellant's brief which refer to this Court's order in the prior action involving these parties is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • A.P. v. F.L., 471/2012.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 15 Noviembre 2017
    ...so-ordered stipulation, Plaintiff was scheduled to have a weekend visit with N.P. on Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. (see Bergstol, 305 A.D.2d at 350 ; see also In re Adolph, 117 AD3d at 496 ; England, 48 AD3d at 838 ). Indeed, Plaintiff himself testified that on February 8, 2013, ......
  • Bergstol v. Town of Monroe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 5 Mayo 2003

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT