Berkman v. Miami Nat. Bank, 61-683
| Decision Date | 10 July 1962 |
| Docket Number | No. 61-683,61-683 |
| Citation | 143 So.2d 535 |
| Parties | Samuel R. BERKMAN and Arthur Siegel, Appellants, v. MIAMI NATIONAL BANK, a United States Banking Association; Florida Carlsbad, Inc., a Florida corporation; Rudolph T. Wagner; Milton Hoff, and the Dublin Co., a Florida corporation, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin, Miami, for appellants.
Frank & Weston and Peter Strelkow, Miami Beach, for Dublin Co.
Burton Harrison, Miami, for Miami Nat. Bank.
Glasel, Meyer & Leben, Hollywood, for Florida Carlsbad, Inc.
Hugh M. Tartaglia, Miami, for Rudolph T. Wagner.
Stanley S. Stein, Miami Beach, for Milton Hoff.
Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Appellants seek review of an adverse deficiency decree subsequent to final decree and judicial sale. This decree, as all other orders, judgments or decrees brought to this court for review, arrives here with a presumption of correctness. City of Miami v. Hollis, Fla.1955, 77 So.2d 834; Sedell v. Sedell, Fla.App.1958, 100 So.2d 639.
In order to entitle an appellant to reversal, it is incumbent upon him to demonstrate harmful error in some action of the trial judge in the proceeding, resulting in the order, judgment or decree under review. Johnson v. Roberts, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 425; Bates v. Brady, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 750. It is also a recognized principle of appellate procedure that if a trial judge's order, judgment or decree can be sustained under any theory revealed by the record on appeal, notwithstanding the fact that the trial judge's order, judgment or decree may have been bottomed on an erroneous theory, the order, judgment or decree will be affirmed. In re Freeman's Petition, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 544; State...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Visingardi v. Tirone, s. 64-595
...However, if the action of the trial judge can be sustained upon any theory, it should not be interfered with. See: Berkman v. Miami National Bank, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 535; Crudele v. Cook, Fla.App.1963, 165 So.2d 424; In re Estate of Schor, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 888 (opinion filed Mar......
-
Murrell v. Jupiter Corp.
...to an exchange of the stock in June of 1953 prior to any alleged misrepresentations occurring in November of 1953. Berkman v. Miami National Bank, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 535; Southern Railway Company v. Wood, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 834; Naples Park-Vanderbilt Beach Water District v. Downi......
-
Forte Towers, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 77-1553
...of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla.1970); First National Bank of Clearwater v. Morse, 248 So.2d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Berkman v. Miami National Bank, 143 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). As mentioned above, the three basic contentions of appellants in attacking the rent control ordinance were that ......
-
Tiny's Liquors, Inc. v. Davis
...Hester v. Gatlin, 332 So.2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Cicerco v. Paradis, 184 So.2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966); and Berkman v. Miami National Bank, 143 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). For the reasons set forth above, the final judgment entered by the trial court is affirmed. In light of this decisi......