Bernstein v. NV NEDERLANDSCHE-AMERIKAANSCHE, ETC.

Decision Date05 February 1954
Docket NumberNo. 21193.,21193.
Citation210 F.2d 375
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
PartiesBERNSTEIN v. N. V. NEDERLANDSCHE-AMERIKAANSCHE STOOMVAART-MAATSCHAPPIJ (Chemical Bank & Trust Co., Third-Party Defendant).

Bennet, House & Couts, New York City, for plaintiff-petitioner; Victor House, Albert I. Edelman and Werner Ilsen, New York City, of counsel.

Burlingham, Hupper & Kennedy, New York City, for defendant Holland-America Line; Harold M. Kennedy, and Hervey C. Allen, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Shearman & Sterling & Wright, New York City, for Third-Party Defendant, Chemical Bank & Trust Company; John A. Wilson, M. VanVoorhies and Edmond K. Leach, New York City, of counsel.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the prior appeal in this case, 173 F.2d 71, 75-76, because of the lack of a definitive expression of Executive Policy, we felt constrained to follow the decision of this court in Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres Societe Anonyme, 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 246, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 772, 68 S.Ct. 88, 92 L.Ed. 357, by ordering the plaintiff to refrain from alleging matters which would cause the court to pass on the validity of acts of officials of the German government. Following our decision, however, the State Department issued Press Release No. 296 on April 27, 1949, entitled: "Jurisdiction of United States Courts Re Suits for Identifiable Property Involved in Nazi Forced Transfers." The substance of this Release follows:

"As a matter of general interest, the Department publishes herewith a copy of a letter of April 13, 1949 from Jack B. Tate, Acting Legal Advisor, Department of State, to the Attorneys for the plaintiff in Civil Action No. 31-555 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
"The letter repeats this Government\'s opposition to forcible acts of dispossession of a discriminatory and confiscatory nature practiced by the Germans on the countries or peoples subject to their controls; states that it is this Government\'s policy to undo the forced transfers and restitute identifiable property to the victims of Nazi persecution wrongfully deprived of such property; and sets forth that the policy of the Executive, with respect to claims asserted in the United States for restitution of such property, is to relieve American courts from any restraint upon the exercise of their jurisdiction to pass upon the validity of the acts
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 cases
  • Von Dardel v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Civ. A. No. 84-0353.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 15 Octubre 1985
    ...law, courts have recognized the need for an appropriate exercise of jurisdiction. In Bernstein v. N.V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij, 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954), the court deferred to a press release issued by the Department of State in which the Department took the p......
  • Sharon v. Time, Inc., 83 Civ. 4660 (ADS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • 12 Noviembre 1984
    ...de Cuba, 406 U.S. 759, 768, 92 S.Ct. 1808, 1813, 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972) (plurality opinion); Bernstein v. N.V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij, 210 F.2d 375, 375-76 (2d Cir.1954); Restatement (Revised) of Foreign Relations Law § 428 at 9-10 (Tent.Draft No. 4, 1983) (where......
  • Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 60 Civ. 4663-CLB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • 4 Enero 1980
    ...Cuban State until much later. In connection with our discussion of Act of State, it must be observed that Chase and Citibank each have a "Bernstein letter" from the Office of the Secretary of State of the United States. Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche, 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954). The 5-4 ......
  • Princz v. Federal Republic of Germany
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 1 Julio 1994
    ...branch would have opted to deny Germany's claims to immunity for the crimes alleged in this case. Cf. Bernstein v. N.V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche, 210 F.2d 375, 376 (2d Cir.1954) (allowing district court to pass on validity of acts of officials of German government due to State Department......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Mergers and Acquisitions. Understanding the Antitrust Issues. Fourth Edition
    • 6 Diciembre 2015
    ...Berkey Photo v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1979), 1 Bernstein v. NV Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche, Stoomvaart-Maatschappij, 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954) (per curiam), 471 B.F. Goodrich Co., 110 F.T.C. 207 (1988), aff’d , 112 F.T.C. 83 (1989), 174, 178, 376 Bigio v. Coca-Cola Co.,......
  • Application of Merger Laws to Multinational Transactions
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Mergers and Acquisitions. Understanding the Antitrust Issues. Fourth Edition
    • 6 Diciembre 2015
    ...to address whether there is a “Bernstein letter” exception, see Bernstein v. NV Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche, Stoomvaart-Maatschappij, 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954) (per curiam), to the act of state doctrine. But the Court’s adoption of a “balancing approach” leaves it open to a court to decli......
  • Customary international law as U.S. law: a critique of the revisionist and intermediate positions and a defense of the modern position.
    • United States
    • Notre Dame Law Review Vol. 86 No. 4, August 2011
    • 1 Agosto 2011
    ...takes its name from Bernstein v. N.V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij, 173 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1949), mandate amended by 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954), and Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres Societe Anonyme, 163 F.2d 246 (2d Cir. (546) See United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203, 22......
  • Samantar and executive power.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 44 No. 4, October 2011
    • 1 Octubre 2011
    ...City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba, 406 U.S. 759, 759-64 (1972); Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij, 210 F.2d 375, 376 (2d Cir. 1954). See generally GARY B. BORN & PETER B. RUTLEDGE, INTERNATIONAL C1VIL LITIGATION IN UNITED STATES COURTS 751-95 (4th ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT