Berry v. Leslie

Decision Date04 May 1908
Citation110 S.W. 685,131 Mo. App. 236
PartiesBERRY et al. v. LESLIE.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Frank F. Rozzelle, Judge.

Action by Thomas Berry and others as copartners against Leo N. Leslie.Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.Affirmed.

Wm. J. Morse, for appellant.James G. Smith, for respondents.

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant on an account before a justice of the peace, and obtained judgment.Defendant appealed to the circuit court of Jackson county, where the cause was tried at the April term, 1906, before Hon. F. F. Rozzelle, who had been elected as special judge to hold a part of that term on account of the illness of Hon. William B. Teasdale, the regular judge.A jury being waived by the parties the cause was submitted to the court, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant appealed.

The record discloses that on the 6th day of October, 1906, and during the said April term, an order was made allowing the appeal and granting defendant leave to file his bill of exceptions "within 10 days after the adjournment of said April term, 1906"; and, further, that the bill was signed and filed on the 16th day of October, which was after the close of the April term, but within the time stated in the order.It was signed by Judge Rozzelle but not by Judge Teasdale.All of the errors assigned relate to matters occurring at the trial, and, as the appeal was brought here by the short form, it was incumbent on defendant to show affirmatively in his abstract of record that his bill of exceptions was properly taken and filed.Quarry Co. v. Construction Co., 72 Mo. App. 478;Hohstadt v. Daggs, 49...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Ward v. Bell
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • Mayo 29, 1911
  • Dixon v. Boeving
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • Enero 18, 1919
    ...affirm `the judgment in this case, if the plaintiff shall within 10 days from the date of the handing down of this opinion remit in this court the sum of $160 and interest thereon from the date of the judgment; otherwise, the cause will be certified to the Supreme Court, because our ruling on the question as to a properly authenticated bill of exceptions is in conflict with the ruling of the Kansas City Court of Appeals, decided in the case of Berry et al. v. Leslie, 131 Mo. App. 236, 110 S.occupying the position of circuit judge at the time the special judge signed the bill of exceptions, which was long after he had ceased acting as special judge and in vacation of court. Respondent cites the case of Berry et al. v. Leslie, 131 Mo. App. 236, 110 S. W. 685. As this same question has been raised in several cases tried at that term of the Butler county circuit court, and an opinion has been written involving the same question by Sturgis, P. J., in the case of Lambert...
  • Lambert v. Lambert
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • Enero 18, 1919
    ...adjournment of the January term of court, since he was elected special judge for that term only and his power as such even in cases tried by him ended with such term. Such is the holding of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Berry Brothers v. Leslie, 131 Mo. App. 236, 110 S. W. 685, where the court pointedly ruled that the office and power of a special judge elected to hold a term or a part of the term of court expires with such term, and he is without authority after the end of such terma bill of exceptions signed in proper time, provides that "the judge before whom such case was tried shall certify in writing such fact"—a procedure altogether incongruous, if such judge before whom the case was tried, being a special judge, could not sign the bill when presented. We hold, therefore, that the bill of exceptions was properly signed by Special Judge Gloriod; but, as this decision is in conflict with Berry Brothers v. Leslie, 131 Mo. App. 236, 110 S. W. 685, this caseSection 2032 is an enabling statute, and authorizes the judge succeeding a regular judge to sign a bill of exceptions, and should not be construed as disabling a special judge to do so. The case which comes nearest upholding Berry Brothers v. Leslie, supra, is Ranney v. Packing Co., 132 Mo. App. 324, 110 S. W. 613, decided by the same court; but the question there related to the power of the regular judge to sign a bill of exceptions during a term of court being held by a special...
  • Brown v. Johnson et al.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • Enero 05, 1942
    ...this case, and nothing before the court but the record proper, which is free from error. Sec. 1178, R.S. Mo. 1939; Ranney v. Hammond Packing Co., 132 Mo. App. 324, 110 S.W. 613; Berry v. Leslie, 131 Mo. App. 258, 110 S.W. 685; Robertson v. McFarland, 87 S.W. (2d) 1067. (2) Appellant's complaint that evidence of plaintiff's objections to the settlement made to others was improperly excluded, and that cross-examination of defendants thereon was denied, is wholly groundless;...
  • Get Started for Free