Bester v. State
Docket Number | CR-21-0334 |
Decision Date | 17 February 2023 |
Citation | 381 So.3d 1155 |
Parties | Timothy Earl BESTER v. STATE of Alabama |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Alisha McKay of Jefferson Defender’s Office, Birmingham,County Public for appellant.
Steve Marshall, att’y gen., and Laura Irby Cuthbert, asst. att’y gen., for appellee.
The appellant, Timothy Earl Bester, was convicted of rape in the first degree, see§ 13A-6-61(a)(1),Ala. Code 1975; two counts of kidnapping in the first degree, see§ 13A-6-43(a)(4),Ala. Code 1975; sexual abuse in the first degree, see§ 13A-6-66(a)(1),Ala. Code 1975; and theft of property in the third degree, see§ 13A-8-4.1(c),Ala. Code 1975.Bester was sentenced as a habitual felony offender to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for the rape and kidnapping convictions, to 20 years’ imprisonment for the sexual-abuse conviction, and to 10 years’ imprisonment for the theft conviction.
In October 2020, Bester was indicted for the rape and kidnapping of K.S.1(C. 344-45;CC-20-1376;andCC-20-1377.)In October 2020, Bester was also indicted for charges of rape, kidnapping, sodomy, and theft against A.J. (C. 346-48;CC-20-1378;CC-20-1379;CC-20-1380;andCC-20-1381.)The State moved that the cases be consolidated for trial.After a hearing, the circuit court granted that motion.The jury convicted Bester of the rape and kidnapping of K.S., and sexual abuse as a lesser-included offense of rape, kidnapping, and theft of A.J.The jury found Bester not guilty of sodomizing A.J.(CC-20-1380.)
The State’s evidence tended to show the following: K.S. testified that in January 2019she was at a convenience store to meet a drug dealer and Bester was at the store at the same time.K.S. said that she had seen Bester a couple of times before and that when her dealer failed to show up Bester offered her a ride to the dealer’s house.(R. 306.)On the way, they stopped at Beater’s house in Pratt City.Bester, she said, told her that he had to get something from the house, and she went inside and sat down.Bester came up to her, she said, and "he told me whenever he wants to, he’s going to get it, and he slammed me on the bed."(R. 309.)The following occurred:
(R. 309-312.)
Stephanie Cacioppo, a former nurse,2 testified that she examined K.S. and conducted a forensic examination.She testified that K.S. had abrasions, bruising, and blood in her vagina, which, she said, was consistent with some type of trauma.(R. 342.)
A.J. testified that she had known Bester since they were young and were in school together.She said that they began sending each other messages on Facebook, and in March 2019he offered to drive her from her home in Anniston to Birmingham.(R. 192.)She said that Bester picked her up at her house and that another man she knew only as "40" was in the car with Bester.They stopped at a gas station in Irondale and A.J. went inside to use the restroom.When she returned to the car, she said, "everything went to hell."(R. 193.)A.J. said that Bester hit her with her cellular telephone and that she went in and out of consciousness.(R. 195.)Bester first took A.J. to his mother’s house in Pratt City; Bester’s house was next door to his mother’s.A.J. said that Bester hit her with everything that he could get his hands on, that he kicked her in the head, and that she had boot prints on her side.(R. 198.)A.J. testified:
(R. 198-203.)
Jessica Stott, a nurse and a sexual assault nurse examiner ("SANE") at the Crisis Center in Birmingham testified that in March 2019she conducted a forensic examination on A.J. Stott testified that A.J. had extensive bruising to her chest, back, and abdomen, scratches, lacerations, marks on her neck, swollen eyes, and her teeth and mouth were bloody.Photographs taken of A.J. showed that A.J. had numerous injuries to her body and face.Stott testified that she attempted to conduct an internal examination but A.J. told her that it was too painful for her to use the instrument.
In his original brief to this Court and in his reply brief, Bester raises the following issues.
[1] Bester first argues that the circuit court erred in granting the State’s motion to consolidate for trial the charges against Bester involving the two victims.3Specifically, he argues that consolidating the cases resulted in extreme prejudice to him and denied him a fair trial.
The record shows that approximately two weeks before trial the State moved to consolidate the cases involving K.S. and A.J. pursuant to Rule 13.3(c), Ala. R. Crim. P.4It asserted that the cases were of the same or similar character, that they were connected in their commission, and that they were "part of a common scheme or plan."(C. 550.)Bester filed an objection to consolidating the cases.In the objection, Bester argued:
(C. 563.)A hearing was held on the motion.(R. 7-21.)At the hearing, the State argued:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
