Betts v. Ann Arbor Public Schools
Citation | 403 Mich. 507,271 N.W.2d 498 |
Decision Date | 20 November 1978 |
Docket Number | N,No. 12,12 |
Parties | Nathaniel J. BETTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee. ov. Term. 403 Mich. 507, 271 N.W.2d 498 |
Court | Supreme Court of Michigan |
Zussman, Doctoroff & Wartell, Martin M. Doctoroff, Southfield, for plaintiff-appellant; Ronald D. Feldman, Oak Park, of counsel.
Lacey & Jones by John L. Salter, Detroit, for defendant-appellee.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, James E. Tobin and Gillian Steinhauer, Detroit, amicus curiae for Michigan Association of School Boards and its 580 Member Boards of Education.
In 1971 plaintiff Betts was a student majoring in physical education at the University of Michigan. One of the requirements for his degree was that he train under the supervision of a certified teacher for a short period commonly referred to as "student teaching," or "practice teaching". Betts student-taught at a junior high school in the Ann Arbor public school system from January to April, 1971. Plaintiff conducted two physical education classes each school-day morning during his four-month student-teaching period. At the time plaintiff was with a class, his supervising teacher, the head of the physical education department, graded papers and did other work around the school.
Plaintiff filed a worker's compensation claim arising from an injury which occurred on his last day of student teaching, April 29, 1971. He described the event in a hearing before the Workmen's Compensation Bureau:
Betts lost his left eye as a result of the incident.
The Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) awarded Betts benefits. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding plaintiff not to be an employee of the Ann Arbor Public Schools at the time of his injury. We granted leave to appeal to consider whether, under Michigan's Worker's Disability Compensation Act, 1969 P.A. 317, M.C.L. § 418.101 Et seq.; M.S.A. § 17.237(101) Et seq., a student teacher is an employee of the school district in which he seeks to fulfill his student teaching requirement.
Whether or not Betts was an employee of the school district is governed by M.C.L. § 418.161(1)(a); M.S.A. § 17.237(161)(1)(a). A public "employee" 1 is defined as:
"Every person in the service of the state or of any county, city, township, village or school district, Under any appointment, or contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written." (Emphasis supplied.)
The WCAB majority's decision that Betts was an employee of the Ann Arbor Public Schools rested primarily on its finding that Betts served under an implied contract of hire. Again, we find the board correct.
Both plaintiff and defendant cite Blust v. Sisters of Mercy, 256 Mich. 1, 239 N.W. 401 (1931), as authority for their arguments on whether or not a contract of hire existed here.
Blust, a novice with the Sisters of Mercy at Mt. Mercy Academy in Grand Rapids, was training to become a teacher in the Catholic schools. She also performed menial services for the order; the order provided her with food, clothing, shelter and medical care. Blust was injured while working in the order's laundry.
This Court affirmed the Department of Labor and Industry's determination that Blust was not an employee of the Sisters of Mercy for workmen's compensation purposes. Defendant reads Blust as authority for the proposition that one in teacher training is not an employee. We agree with plaintiff and the WCAB that Blust does not stand for that proposition.
The majority in Blust rested its decision, in large part, on the fact that the order, as a charitable organization without pecuniary purpose, was not analogous to a commercial enterprise. Hence, those training for charitable work have a different status than those who train to qualify for work with pay. Justice Wiest wrote in Blust, pp. 11-12, 239 N.W. p. 404:
Justice Wiest further noted that the Sisters of Mercy did have employees working under contracts of hire. The order carried compensation insurance for those employees, but members and novices were not covered by that insurance. Additionally, the novice's relationship to the order was such that any compensation award would belong to the Sisters of Mercy rather than Blust herself. Thus "(i)t would be a strange situation, indeed, to permit the Sisters of Mercy, one defendant herein, to reimburse itself for expenses incurred in caring for a novitiate, in the manner here attempted". Blust, supra, p. 12, 239 N.W. p. 405. 3 Finally, the majority was not able to find a contract of hire. 4
While Blust's relationship with the Sisters of Mercy was a religious and charitable affiliation, Betts' relationship with the Ann Arbor Public Schools had the earmarks of a commercial relationship. Betts was not a volunteer, nor was the school district required to accept a student teacher. Those who perform services gratuitously are generally excluded from the definition of "employee", 5 but the payment necessary to establish a contract of hire need not be in money. As Larson 6 explains, "Compensation law * * * is a mutual arrangement between the employer and employee under which both give up and gain certain things."
We agree with the WCAB majority's finding of such an arrangement in the instant case.
The Court of Appeals decision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Workmen's Compensation Bureau for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the WCAB.
M.C.L. § 418.161(1) (a); M.S.A. § 17.237(161)(1)(a). It is unnecessary, therefore, to reach the question whether Betts served the school district as an employee under an implied "contract of hire".
I respectfully dissent from the judgment of my colleagues in the majority and from what I perceive to be the strained construction they have given M.C.L.A. § 418.161; M.S.A. § 17.237(161). 1 The conclusion is inescapable that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lyons v. Chittenden Cent. Supervisory Union
...we are particularly persuaded by the following decisions, which are on point and support our decision: Betts v. Ann Arbor Public Schools, 403 Mich. 507, 271 N.W.2d 498, 500–01 (1978) (holding student teacher received remuneration, "[i]n return, plaintiff was paid in the form of training, co......
-
McClure v. General Motors Corp., Fisher Body Division, Fleetwood Plant
...notwithstanding expert medical disagreement with such definitions and despite no loss of earning capacity); Betts v. Ann Arbor Public Schools, 403 Mich. 507, 271 N.W.2d 498 (1978) (Fourth-year university education degree candidate performing university required "student teaching" at one of ......
-
Lyons v. Chittenden Cent. Supervisory Union
...we are particularly persuaded by the following decisions, which are on point and support our decision: Betts v. Ann Arbor Public Schools, 271 N.W.2d 498, 500-01 (Mich. 1978) (holding student teacher received remuneration, "[i]n return, plaintiff was paid in the form of training, college cre......
-
Walls v. North Mississippi Medical Center & U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co.
...... express or implied ...;" thus, this Court next addresses an implied contract of hire. In the case of Betts v. Ann Arbor Public Schools, 403 Mich. 507, 271 N.W.2d 498 (1978), a university student while "practice teaching" in a high school to fulfill his student teaching requirement, was ......