Beyer v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
Decision Date | 13 April 1897 |
Citation | 114 Ala. 424,21 So. 952 |
Parties | BEYER v. LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Cullman county; H. C. Speake, Judge.
Action by Frank Beyer against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company to recover damages for the death of his minor son Joseph Beyer, which was alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant's employés.From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.Affirmed.
Cofer & Brown, for appellant.
Thos G. Jones, for appellee.
C. H Herrin was an employé of the appellee company, having charge of the operation of the pump at Phelan station, used for filling the tank there, from which the locomotives on the road were supplied with water.The company had in its employ a pump repairer, whose duty it was to make all repairs on the pumps which Herrin himself could not make, and he had a general pass to ride on all trains in the discharge of his duties.Herrin had no authority to employ special workmen to make such repairs, except at his own expense.The pump at Phelan becoming out of order, Herrin, without special authority, employed the plaintiff's minor son, Joe Beyer who was a mechanic residing at Cullman, on the line of defendant's road, about two miles from Phelan, to repair it.To reach Phelan for the purpose of doing the work, Beyer, in company with one George Shelton, who had formerly been a brakeman on defendant's road, boarded a freight train of defendant at Cullman.The train consisted of a locomotive and 22 cars, with caboose in the rear.It did not carry passengers, and did not ordinarily stop at Phelan.At Cullman it did not stop, but when these parties got aboard it had reduced its speed to that of about a man's walk.Beyer got on at about the fourth car from the locomotive, and took his position on top of that car (a box car), sitting on the edge, with his feet downward on the side.Shelton got on the fifth car, but did not remain there, but passed down, from one car to the other, until he reached and took his position on the caboose.After going a short distance (about one-fourth of a mile) the conductor (presumably in the caboose) asked Shelton where they were going.Shelton replied, "To Phelan, to fix the pump."The conductor responded, "Go tell the engineer," to which Shelton rejoined, "That is your business."Shelton further testified: "I told Bob [the conductor] where we were going, and he said he was going through there like hell scorching a feather."It does not appear that the parties boarded the train by authority of the conductor or any one else.The train ran about 15 miles (Beyer being still in his position on top of the box car), when, for some cause unknown and unexplained, except such explanation, if any, as may be inferred from what will presently be stated in reference to the manner one of the cars was loaded with pipe, it became derailed, causing its wreck, and by which Beyer was so injured that he died.The last five cars and the caboose remained on the tract, and no one on or in them was injured.Touching the cause of the derailment, the only evidence introduced proceeded from said Shelton, who was examined by the plaintiff, and who testified as follows: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
First Nat. Bank v. Sanders
...plaintiff's danger in advance of his injury, and hence was guilty of no dereliction of duty, and further, that, even if negligence might be attributed to defendant's agent, still plaintiff took a position of unnecessary danger, and in doing so he was, upon the undisputed evidence, guilty of negligence contributory to his injury, put in issue by appropriate plea.
Beyer v. L. & N. R. Co., 114 Ala. 424, 21 So. 952." court therefore erred in refusing the affirmative charge requested by the... - Broyles v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
-
Evans v. Buck Creek Cotton Mills
...agent, still plaintiff took a position of unnecessary danger, and in doing so he was, upon the undisputed evidence, guilty of negligence contributory to his injury, put in issue by appropriate plea. Beyer v. Louisville & N.R. Co.,
114 Ala. 424, 21 So. 952." We have indicated that there was no effort on plaintiff's part to show that the foregoing presumption of liability or responsibility did not apply to deceased, and for the purpose of this appeal the presumption became... - Crider v. Yolande Coal & Coke Co.