Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Entertainment
Decision Date | 08 May 2009 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 137500.,COA No. 285593. |
Citation | 483 Mich. 1001,764 N.W.2d 575 |
Parties | Andre BEZEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PALACE SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the jurisdictional standard established at MCL 418.845, as interpreted by this Court in Karaczweski v. Farbman Stein & Co., 478 Mich. 28, 732 N.W.2d 56 (2007), should be applied in this case. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
The Worker's Compensation Section of the State Bar of Michigan is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Ent. Inc.
...award of benefits is proper under Rakestraw [ v. Gen. Dynamics Land Systems, Inc., 469 Mich. 220, 666 N.W.2d 199 (2003)].” Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued February 28, 2006 (Docket No. 258350), p. 5, 2006 WL 473802......
- Michigan Education Association v. Secretary of State, Docket No. 137451.