Bhandari v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce, 85-3445

Decision Date02 November 1989
Docket NumberNo. 85-3445,85-3445
Citation887 F.2d 609
Parties55 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 226, 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,761 Jeetendra BHANDARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Mark G. Murov, Rita K. Ward, Murov & Ward, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

John T. Nockleby, Sr. Litigation Atty., MALDEF, E. Richard Larson, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund.

Dando B. Cellini, Bennet S. Koren, Susan E. Santiago, New Orleans, La., for amicus curiae Consumer Bankers and La. Bankers, etc.

James B. Irwin, Marta Alison Richards, Montgomery, Barnett, Brown & Read, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH and DUHE, * Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In Bhandari v. First National Bank of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc), we held that the protections of 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 do not extend to prohibit alienage discrimination by private persons, despite the Supreme Court authority of Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160, 96 S.Ct. 2586, 49 L.Ed.2d 415 (1976) that those protections do extend to prohibit racial discrimination by such persons. On writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court has now vacated our judgment and remanded Bhandari to us "for further consideration in light of Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. ----, [109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132] (1989)." Having done so, we conclude that Patterson does not bear on our earlier decision; and we therefore reinstate that decision.

In Patterson, so far as is material here, the Court reaffirmed its decision in Runyon, declining to retreat from that holding despite having requested briefing on the question whether it was correctly decided. We arrived at our earlier en banc decision of this appeal in full recognition of the authority of Runyon, albeit expressing reservations along the way regarding its analysis; and its reaffirmance does not alter the precedential landscape that we must take into account in any relevant way. Those who dissented from our original en banc decision, while adhering to the views they there expressed on the merits of the issues, concur with the remainder of our court that Patterson does not affect today's decision. 1 Our earlier mandate is therefore reinstated; it is so

ORDERED.

* Judge Robert...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Sagana v. Tenorio
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 7 d2 Setembro d2 2004
    ...of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343, 1345-48 (5th Cir.1987), vacated, 492 U.S. 901, 109 S.Ct. 3207, 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), reinstated, 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir.1989); De Malherbe v. Int'l Union of Elevator Constructors, 438 F.Supp. 1121, 1136-42 4. The cases track the courts' heroic efforts to determi......
  • Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. All Am. Check Cashing, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 3 d2 Março d2 2020
    ...cert. granted, judgment vacated , 492 U.S. 901, 109 S.Ct. 3207, 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), and opinion reinstated , 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam).32 See 12 U.S.C. §§ 4512(a), 5491(b)(1).33 See id. § 5491(c)(1), (3) (CFPB) ; id. § 4512(b)(2) (FHFA).34 See id. §§ 4516(a), 5497. It’s ......
  • Duane v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 7 d5 Fevereiro d5 1992
    ...discrimination, and that the six judges who dissented from the prior opinion remained outnumbered. Bhandari v. First National Bank of Commerce, 887 F.2d 609, 610 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1061, 110 S.Ct. 1539, 108 L.Ed.2d 778 7 This argument paraphrases a similar argument made ......
  • Anderson v. Conboy
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 10 d4 Setembro d4 1998
    ...(in light of Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132 (1989)), reaffirmed on remand, 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir.1989) (per curiam). Prior to the instant matter, we have had no occasion to consider the question. One district court in this circuit has held th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Restricting the freedom of contract: a fundamental prohibition.
    • United States
    • Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal No. 16, January 2013
    • 1 d2 Janeiro d2 2013
    ...Bhandari v. First National Bank of Commerce, 808 F.2d 1082, 1088 n.13, 14 (5th Cir. 1987), vacated by 492 U.S. 901 (1989), reinstated by 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1989) (compiling cases opining that [section] 1981 prohibits alienage discrimination). (315.) See Waisome v. Port Authority of New ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT