Bialko v. H. Baker Milk Co.

Decision Date20 February 1956
Citation20 N.J. 535,120 A.2d 662
PartiesMichael BIALKO, Petitioner-Respondent, v. H. BAKER MILK CO., Inc., Respondent-Petitioner.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

See same case below: 38 N.J.Super. 169, 118 A.2d 412.

Emory, Langan & Lamb, Jersey City, and Paul B. Thompson, Montclair, for the petitioner.

Joseph Teich, Passaic, and Mortimer Wald, Newark, for the respondent.

Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Celeste v. Progressive Silk Finishing Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • February 1, 1962
    ...at p. 24, 165 A.2d 191); Bialko v. H. Baker Milk Co., 38 N.J.Super. 169, 171, 118 A.2d 412 (App.Div.1955), certif. denied 20 N.J. 535, 120 A.2d 662 (1956); Fusco v. Cambridge Piece Dyeing Corp., 135 N.J.L. 160, 162, 50 A.2d 870 (E. & A. 1947). It is quite clear from petitioner's medical tes......
  • Joy v. Florence Pipe Foundry Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • November 14, 1960
    ...A.2d 870 (E. & A. 1947); Bialko v. H. Baker Milk Co., 38 N.J. Super. 169, 171, 118 A.2d 412 (App.Div.1955), certification denied 20 N.J. 535, 120 A.2d 662 (1956). But the scales are balanced in the instant case by several factors, including Dr. Schisler's permanent association with responde......
  • Bayer v. Frank P. Farrell, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • October 6, 1961
    ...A.2d 23 (App.Div.1952); Bialko v. H. Baker Milk Co., 38 N.J.Super. 169, 172, 118 A.2d 412 (App.Div.1955), certification denied 20 N.J. 535, 120 A.2d 662 (1956). Failure to call the aforesaid lay and expert witnesses permits the inference that 'their testimony would not be as favorable to ap......
  • Bisonic v. Halsey Packard, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • June 28, 1960
    ...A.2d 23 (App.Div.1952); Bialko v. H. Baker Milk Co., 38 N.J.Super. 169, 171, 118 A.2d 412 (App.Div.1955), certification denied 20 N.J. 535, 120 A.2d 662 (1956). These factors coupled with petitioner's own testimony have persuaded us that petitioner's contentions are supported by the prepond......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT