Biancardi v. Waldwick Board of Education
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | Biancardi v. Waldwick Board of Education, 372 A.2d 304, 73 N.J. 37 (N.J. 1977) |
| Decision Date | 06 April 1977 |
| Parties | Nicoletta BIANCARDI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WALDWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent-Respondent. |
On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 139 N.J.Super. 175, 353 A.2d 123 (1976).
Theodore M. Simon, Landing, for petitioner-appellant (Goldberg, Simon & Selikoff, Landing, attorneys).
Steven M. Honig, Waldwick, for respondent-respondent (Honig & Honig, Waldwick, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance: Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD--7.
For reversal: None.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Spiewak v. Board of Educ. of Rutherford
...345, 40 A.2d 663 (E. & A. 1945); Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Ed., 139 N.J.Super. 175, 353 A.2d 123 (App.Div.1976), aff'd o. b., 73 N.J. 37, 372 A.2d 304 (1977); Capella v. Camden Cty. Voc. Tech. Sch. Bd. of Ed., 145 N.J.Super. 209, 367 A.2d 444 (App.Div.1976). None of these decisions justi......
-
Hunterdon Central High School Bd. of Ed. v. Hunterdon Central High School Teachers' Ass'n
...is in accordance with the law. Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Ed., 139 N.J.Super. 175, 177, 353 A.2d 123 (App.Div.1976), aff'd 73 N.J. 37, 372 A.2d 304 (1977). We turn now to a consideration of whether PERC correctly concluded that the granting of paid leaves of absence for religious purposes......
-
Lukas v. State, Dept. of Human Services
...173 N.J.Super. 11 [412 A.2d 1352] (App.Div.1980); Biancardi v. Waldwick, 139 N.J.Super. 175 [353 A.2d 123] (App.Div.1976), aff'd 73 N.J. 37 [372 A.2d 304] (1977). [Ward, supra, OAL, slip op. at These precedents were specifically overruled or limited by our decision in Spiewak v. Rutherford ......
-
Sayreville Educ. Ass'n, on Behalf of Rucki v. Board of Educ. of Borough of Sayreville, Middlesex County
...and the State Board relied on Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Educ., 139 N.J.Super. 175, 353 A.2d 123 (App.Div.1976), aff'd o.b., 73 N.J. 37, 372 A.2d 304 (1977), and Driscoll v. Clifton Bd. of Educ., 165 N.J.Super. 241, 398 A.2d 97 (App.Div.1977), aff'd o.b., 79 N.J. 126, 398 A.2d 90 (1979). ......