Bickford v. United States, 13812.
| Decision Date | 19 August 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 13812.,13812. |
| Citation | 206 F.2d 395 |
| Parties | BICKFORD v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Norvell Milbern Bickford, appellant, in propria persona.
Edward W. Scruggs, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., Oliver T. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.
Bickford appeals from a judgment, D.C., 109 F.Supp. 154, denying him relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which he filed on February 6, 1953. This is his third motion on substantially the same grounds.
Section 2255 provides: "The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner."
The judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sovich v. Esperdy
... ... No. 211, Docket 27808 ... United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit ... Argued January 18, 1963 ... ...
-
Belton v. United States
...10 Cir., 177 F.2d 438; Shobe v. United States, 8 Cir., 220 F.2d 928, 929; United States v. Brown, 7 Cir., 207 F.2d 310; Bickford v. United States, 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 395." In Johnson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1954, 213 F.2d 492, the appellant filed in the sentencing court a second motion base......
-
Bistram v. United States
...10 Cir., 177 F.2d 438; Shobe v. United States, 8 Cir., 220 F.2d 928, 929; United States v. Brown, 7 Cir., 207 F.2d 310; Bickford v. United States, 9 Cir., 206 F. 2d 395.' "In Johnson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1954, 213 F.2d 492, the appellant filed in the sentencing court a second motion ba......
-
Dunn v. United States, 12702.
...10 Cir., 177 F.2d 438; Shobe v. United States, 8 Cir., 220 F.2d 928, 929; United States v. Brown, 7 Cir., 207 F.2d 310; Bickford v. United States, 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 395. In any event, appellant's criticism of the wording of the indictment was a matter to be tested by appeal, not by a motion ......