Bigbee Fertilizer Co. v. Smith
Decision Date | 20 January 1914 |
Docket Number | 101 |
Citation | 65 So. 37,186 Ala. 552 |
Parties | BIGBEE FERTILIZER CO. v. SMITH, State Auditor. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied April 16, 1914
Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; W.W. Pearson, Judge.
Mandamus by the Bigbee Fertilizer Company against C.B. Smith, as State Auditor. Writ denied, and petitioner appeals. Reversed and remanded.
The petition alleges that petitioner is a corporation organized for the purpose of manufacturing fertilizer and selling same and that under the provisions of subdivision 41, § 2361, Code 1907, it paid to the probate judge of Montgomery county Ala., for the years 1908, 1909, and 1910, the sum of $200 for state purposes, and $50 for county purposes; that under the provisions of subsection 26 of section 2361, all corporations doing business in the state not otherwise specifically required to pay a license tax are required annually to pay the privilege tax mentioned in said subsection, the same being based upon the amount of the capital stock of said corporation, and that, although petitioner during the years 1908, 1909, and 1910, paid the sum required as license for operating a fertilizer factory, the sum of $200 for the state and $50 for the county as a license for operating such factory under subsection 41, the judge of probate also demanded and required, during said years above set out, that petitioner pay the corporation license under subsection 26 and accordingly your petitioner paid the judge of probate $200 during each of said years for the use of the state and $50 during each of said years for the county to procure a license for such years for doing business, as required by section 26, but that the amount so paid during each of said years, was paid to said judge of probate under a mistake or error of said judge of probate, and petitioner is entitled to have said amount so erroneously collected by the judge of probate refunded to it under section 2411, Code 1907, as amended by the act approved August 25, 1909. "Petitioner further alleges that, pursuant to the provisions of section 2412, it made application to the judge of probate for a certificate under said section, and the judge of probate issued to your petitioner two certificates which are set out and marked Exhibits A and B." It is then alleged that the certificates were presented to the auditor, and he declined to pay them, or to recognize them as binding on the state. The certificates referred to are as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Woco Pep Co. of Montgomery v. City of Montgomery
... ... L.R.A.1918C, 522; State v. Goldstein, 207 Ala. 569, ... 93 So. 308; Ex parte Robert Smith (Ala.Sup.) 102 So. 122; ... Adams, Tax Col. v. Southern Ry., 167 Ala. 383, 52 ... So. 439; Van ... (N.S.) 627; McLendon v. State, 179 Ala. 54, 60 So ... 392, Ann.Cas.1915C, 691; Bigbee Fertilizer Co. v. Smith, ... Auditor, 186 Ala. 552, 65 So. 37; Ex parte City of ... Birmingham ... ...
-
Melof v. Hunt
...equo et bono, it is but natural right and justice that the mistake should be corrected and the money refunded. Bigbee Fertilizer Co. v. Smith, 186 Ala. 55, 65 So. 37, 39 (1914) (quoting White v. Smith, 117 Ala. 232, 23 So. 525 Perhaps the best example of the statute's potential scope can be......
-
Allgood v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
... ... by the Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company originally ... directed to C. Brooks Smith, as State Auditor, and revived ... against M.C. Allgood, as his successor in office, to compel ... money refunded." White v. Smith, 117 Ala. 232, ... 23 So. 525; Bigbee, etc., Co. v. Smith, 186 Ala ... 552, 65 So. 37 ... This ... just policy has been ... ...
-
Board of Revenue and Road Com'rs of Mobile County v. Jones
... ... and remanded ... Geo. A ... Sossaman, of Mobile, for appellants ... Smith & ... Johnston, of Mobile, for appellee ... BOULDIN, ... The ... appeal is ... Lovelady et al. v. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb, 191 Ala ... 96, 68 So. 48; Bigbee Fertilizer Co. v. Smith, ... Auditor, 186 Ala. 552, 65 So. 37; Blan, Auditor v ... Hollywood ... ...