Billingsley v. Ford Motor Co., s. 20220

Decision Date03 January 1996
Docket NumberNos. 20220,20222,s. 20220
CitationBillingsley v. Ford Motor Co., 913 S.W.2d 137 (Mo. App. 1996)
PartiesMelinda Daina BILLINGSLEY, Individually, Melinda Daina Billingsley, as Next Friend of Anthony Ray Billingsley, and John T. and Eleanor Billingsley, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Michael J. Patton, Turner, Reid, Duncan, Loomer & Patton, P.C., Springfield, George E. Feldmiller, Stinson, Mag & Fizzell, P.C., Kansas City, for appellant.

Richard E. Davis and John E. Price, Whiteaker & Wilson, P.C., Springfield, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

On April 6, 1995, a default "Final Judgment" was entered against Defendant-AppellantFord Motor Company.Defendant sought to have the "Judgment" set aside under Rule 74.05(d).Following hearing, Defendant's Motion to set aside the "Judgment" was denied on May 5, 1995.Thereafter, Defendant filed, on May 15, 1995, Notice of Appeal, seeking to appeal from the "Judgment," and a Notice of Appeal from the Order overruling its Motion to set aside the "Default Judgment."Portions of the "Final Judgment" stated:

a) The Plaintiffs are awarded the amount of $3,866,445.00 for the wrongful death of John T. Billingsley, II.

b) Plaintiff, Melinda Daina Billingsley is awarded the amount of $500,000.00 on her claim for personal injuries sustained as a result of the accident, past and future medical expenses, past and future psychological counseling expenses, as well as past and future pain and suffering.

c) PlaintiffTony Billingsley is awarded the amount of $500,000.00 on his claim for personal injuries sustained as a result of the accident, past and future medical expenses, past and future psychological counseling expenses, as well as past and future pain and suffering.

d) On the claim of plaintiffs for punitive damages against Ford Motor Company, the Court finds in favor of plaintiffs and assesses the damages of plaintiffs for punitive damages in the amount of $2,608,366.00.

Nowhere does the purported Judgment allocate the damages for wrongful death to the Plaintiffs, nor does it state the amount of punitive damages to which each individual Plaintiff is entitled.With certain exceptions not applicable here, a judgment must be in such form that execution may issue without requiring external proof or another hearing.Commerce Bank of Springfield v. Green, 760 S.W.2d 602, 603(Mo.App.1988).

This District stated in Cook v. Curtis, 837 S.W.2d 29, 30(Mo.App.1992), "A judgment which is indefinite is void and unenforceable [citing cases].'[I]n this state, appellate courts acquire no jurisdiction on appeal from a void order except jurisdiction to determine the invalidity of the order or judgment appealed from and to dismiss the appeal.' "

The trial court was required by § 537.095.3 RSMo 1994, to apportion the damages in the wrongful death case "among the persons entitled thereto in proportion to the losses suffered."That was not done.The districts of this Court...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Billingsley v. Ford Motor Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1997
    ...final appealable judgment due to the trial court's failure to apportion damages among the various plaintiffs. See Billingsley v. Ford Motor Co., 913 S.W.2d 137 (Mo.App.1996).2 All references to rules are to Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure (1996) unless otherwise noted.3 Plaintiffs and the......
  • American West. Bonding Co. v. United Sur.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 31, 2004
    ...be determined. Therefore, the trial court's "judgment" of August 23, 2002, was too indefinite to be final. See Billingsley v. Ford Motor Co., 913 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Mo.App.1996) (trial court's failure to allocate a punitive damage award between two plaintiffs made the judgment too indefinite ......
  • Kitsmiller Const. Co., Inc. v. Lloyd's Cleaners, Inc., 20929
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 19, 1997
    ...external proof and another hearing. Commerce Bank of Springfield v. Green, 760 S.W.2d 602, 603 (Mo.App.1988). In Billingsley v. Ford Motor Co., 913 S.W.2d 137 (Mo.App.1996), punitive damages were awarded to plaintiffs without specifying the amount to which each plaintiff was entitled. This ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Section 4.17 Apportionment and Distribution
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Settling Cases Deskbook Chapter 4 Wrongful Death
    • Invalid date
    ...a final judgment. A wrongful death judgment that does not apportion is not final and may not be appealed. Billingsley v. Ford Motor Co., 913 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Mo. App. S.D. In the employer-employee situation in which the issue of subrogation may arise, see Menees v. National Super Markets, I......