Binns v. Adams
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Kansas |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | 54 Kan. 615,38 P. 792 |
| Decision Date | 01 January 1895 |
| Parties | Z. E. BINNS v. J. J. ADAMS et al |
38 P. 792
54 Kan. 615
Z. E. BINNS
v.
J. J. ADAMS et al
Supreme Court of Kansas
January 1, 1895
Error from Chautauqua District Court.
ACTION by Binns against Adams and another. Plaintiff brings here for review a judgment in favor of defendants. A sufficient statement of the case is contained in the opinion herein, filed January 5, 1895.
Judgment affirmed.
J. D. McBrian, for plaintiff in error.
Asp, Shartel & Cottingham, for defendants in error.
OPINION
[54 Kan. 616] PER CURIAM.
The only errors complained of in the petition in error relate to matters on the trial for which a new trial was prayed for. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error; therefore no question is properly raised in this court for our consideration. ( Carson v. Funk, 27 Kan. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 id. 129.) The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The Coffeyville Gas Company v. Dooley, 14,466
...[84 P. 720] Bank v. Jaffray,, 41 Kan. 691, 19 P. 626; Carson v. Funk, 27 Kan. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 Kan. 72, 19 P. 327; Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 P. 792; Cogshall v. Spurry, 47 Kan. 448, 28 P. 154; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 Kan. 129, 23 P. 109.) The errors assigned raise que......
-
Beall v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.
...and acted upon by the trial court, and its ruling excepted to, and afterwards assigned for error in the supreme court. ( Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 P. 792; Clark v. Schnur, 40 Kan. 72, 19, 19 P. 327 P. 327; Cogshall v. Spurry, 47 Kan. 448, 28 P. 154; Carson v. Funk, 27 Kan. 524.) No av......
-
Yerkes v. McGuire
...and garnishment proceedings were thereupon instituted against C. M. Shimeall, M. F. Brown, and H. Evans, each of whom returned an answer [54 Kan. 615] showing indebtedness to J. V. Farwell & Co. Thereupon the plaintiff moved for judgment against the garnishees on their answers. This motion ......
-
Perry v. Wheeler, 12,514
...in error as one of the errors complained of. By this omission all of the errors occurring at the trial are waived. (Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 P. 792.) We may not consider, therefore, any errors except such as would have come to us by a transcript of the papers in the case. It is urged......
-
The Coffeyville Gas Company v. Dooley, 14,466
...[84 P. 720] Bank v. Jaffray,, 41 Kan. 691, 19 P. 626; Carson v. Funk, 27 Kan. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 Kan. 72, 19 P. 327; Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 P. 792; Cogshall v. Spurry, 47 Kan. 448, 28 P. 154; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 Kan. 129, 23 P. 109.) The errors assigned raise que......
-
Beall v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.
...and acted upon by the trial court, and its ruling excepted to, and afterwards assigned for error in the supreme court. ( Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 P. 792; Clark v. Schnur, 40 Kan. 72, 19, 19 P. 327 P. 327; Cogshall v. Spurry, 47 Kan. 448, 28 P. 154; Carson v. Funk, 27 Kan. 524.) No av......
-
Yerkes v. McGuire
...and garnishment proceedings were thereupon instituted against C. M. Shimeall, M. F. Brown, and H. Evans, each of whom returned an answer [54 Kan. 615] showing indebtedness to J. V. Farwell & Co. Thereupon the plaintiff moved for judgment against the garnishees on their answers. This motion ......
-
Perry v. Wheeler, 12,514
...in error as one of the errors complained of. By this omission all of the errors occurring at the trial are waived. (Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 P. 792.) We may not consider, therefore, any errors except such as would have come to us by a transcript of the papers in the case. It is urged......