Birdseye v. Shaeffer
| Decision Date | 27 April 1891 |
| Parties | BIRDSEYE v. SHAEFFER et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Phil B. Thompson and J. M. Vale, for motion.
Bethel Coopwood and John Hancock, opposed.
The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of Gurnee v. County of Patrick, 137 U. S. 141, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 34; Railroad Co. v. Thouron, 134 U. S. 45, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 517. Writ of error dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Vaughan v. McArthur Bros. Co.
... ... Co ... v. Thouron, 134 U.S. 45, 10 Sup.Ct. 517, 33 L.Ed. 871; ... Gurnee v. Patrick, 137 U.S. 141, 11 Sup.Ct. 34, 34 ... L.Ed. 601; Birdseye v. Shaeffer, 140 U.S. 117, 11 ... Sup.Ct. 885, 35 L.Ed. 402; Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis ... & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Roberts, 141 U.S. 690, 12 ... ...
-
Powers v. Chesapeake Ry Co
...court. Gurnee v. Patrick Co., 137 U. S. 141, 11 Sup. Ct. 34; In re Pennsylvania Co., 137 U. S. 451, 11 Sup. Ct. 141; Birdseye v. Schaeffer, 140 U. S. 117, 11 Sup. Ct. 885; Railway Co. v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 556, 16 Sup. Ct. After the case had been so remanded, and when it was called for t......
- Williams v. Heard