Bisson v. State, No. 96-3262

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Writing for the CourtW. SHARP
Citation696 So.2d 504
Parties22 Fla. L. Weekly D1649 Joseph BISSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Decision Date03 July 1997
Docket NumberNo. 96-3262

Page 504

696 So.2d 504
22 Fla. L. Weekly D1649
Joseph BISSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-3262.
District Court of Appeal of Florida,
Fifth District.
July 3, 1997.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

W. SHARP, Judge.

Bisson pled guilty to three criminal offenses in three different criminal cases. In one case he was sentenced to 60 months in prison with credit for time served. The judge placed Bisson on concurrent five year terms of probation for the remaining three felony charges, and one concurrent year of probation for a misdemeanor charge. The offenses were committed in 1994 and 1995. He was sentenced on October 29, 1996. We affirm in all regards, except for the trial court's imposition of a special condition of probation that Bisson pay $75.00 investigative costs to the New Smyrna Beach Police Department.

Page 505

In this case, the record reflects that the state made no request for investigative costs, nor was there any documentation offered to support the assessment. Imposition of investigative costs under these circumstances is illegal. Walker v. State, 692 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Pazo v. State, 684 So.2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Meyers v. State, 676 So.2d 57 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Golden v. State, 667 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

The state argues that section 924.051(3), Fla. Stat., which took effect July 1, 1996, bars this appeal because under the statute, an issue can only be appealed if it is either preserved by a timely objection, or is fundamental. Assuming this statute can be retroactively applied, 1 we think Bisson's right to challenge the investigative fees on appeal remains viable. A trial court has no authority to impose investigative costs without a request or documentation. To do so constitutes an illegal sentence and therefore fundamental error.

AFFIRMED. Investigative Costs to New Smyrna Beach Police Department STRICKEN.

DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

---------------

1 See Neal v. State, 688 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 practice notes
  • Maddox v. State, No. 96-3590
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 13, 1998
    ...Statutes (Supp.1996) limits to $200 the "additional court costs" which can be imposed by the trial court. In Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), this court addressed an analogous cost issue, despite the failure to file a rule 3.800(b) motion or otherwise preserve t......
  • Tolbert v. State, No. 96-00209
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • August 20, 1997
    ...prosecution and investigative costs absent a request and documentation. To do so constitutes an illegal sentence. See Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Mickler v. State, 682 So.2d 607, 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en Accord......
  • Williams v. State, No. 96-1657
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 17, 1997
    ...costs. Absent the documentation, the costs must be stricken because the trial court lacked the authority to impose them. Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Pazo v. State, 684 So.2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA Finally, Williams challenges, and the state concedes, a scrivener's error i......
  • Abbott v. State, No. 96-3103
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • December 24, 1997
    ...when a defendant is adjudicated and sentenced for an offense greater in degree than that returned in the verdict), and Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (imposition of investigative costs on defendant, where state did not request costs and there was no documentation to supp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Maddox v. State, No. 96-3590
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 13, 1998
    ...Statutes (Supp.1996) limits to $200 the "additional court costs" which can be imposed by the trial court. In Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), this court addressed an analogous cost issue, despite the failure to file a rule 3.800(b) motion or otherwise preserve t......
  • Tolbert v. State, No. 96-00209
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • August 20, 1997
    ...prosecution and investigative costs absent a request and documentation. To do so constitutes an illegal sentence. See Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Mickler v. State, 682 So.2d 607, 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en Accord......
  • Williams v. State, No. 96-1657
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 17, 1997
    ...costs. Absent the documentation, the costs must be stricken because the trial court lacked the authority to impose them. Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Pazo v. State, 684 So.2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA Finally, Williams challenges, and the state concedes, a scrivener's error i......
  • Abbott v. State, No. 96-3103
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • December 24, 1997
    ...when a defendant is adjudicated and sentenced for an offense greater in degree than that returned in the verdict), and Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (imposition of investigative costs on defendant, where state did not request costs and there was no documentation to supp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT