Bivins v. State, 06S00-9602-PD-173.
Decision Date | 19 January 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 06S00-9602-PD-173.,06S00-9602-PD-173. |
Citation | 741 N.E.2d 1196 |
Parties | BIVINS, Gerald W., appellant, v. STATE of Indiana appellee. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
ORDER DENYING REHEARING IN CAPITAL CASE
cert. denied 516 U.S. 1077, 116 S.Ct. 783, 133 L.Ed.2d 734 (1996). A collateral challenge under Indiana's rules for post-conviction relief has been denied. See Bivins v. State, 735 N.E.2d 1116 (Ind.2000). By this order, the Court DENIES the petition for rehearing in the post-conviction appeal.
ACCORDINGLY, Bivins has received the review to which he is entitled as a matter of right in Indiana state courts. Pursuant to Indiana Criminal Rule 24(H) and Indiana Code § 35-50-2-9, the Court orders that execution of the sentence be set for March 14, 2001, before the hour of sunrise. The prison Superintendent/Warden is directed to carry out the execution in accordance with Indiana law. This order shall constitute the warrant for execution described in Indiana Code §§ 35-38-6-2 & -3, but is subject to any stay issued by a federal court.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Gerald Bivins, c/o Indiana State Prison, Michigan City, Indiana; to the Hon. Thomas K. Milligan, Judge, Montgomery Circuit Court; to the Hon. James C. Detamore, Judge, Boon Superior Court; to the Public Defender of Indiana; to the Attorney General of Indiana; to the Warden/Superintendent of the Indiana State Prison; to the Commissioner of the Department of Correction; to Fred R. Biesecker, Counsel to the Governor; and to counsel of record.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Taylor v. State
...cites Townsend v. State, 632 N.E.2d 727 (Ind.1994), and Castillo v. State, 734 N.E.2d 299 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), summarily aff'd, 741 N.E.2d 1196 (Ind.2001). In Townsend, the defendant had been charged in a single count indictment with battery. The indictment read that the defendant "did knowin......
-
Beer v. State
...was sufficient for officer's testimony to provide probable cause for issuance of search warrant), reh'g denied, summarily aff'd by, 741 N.E.2d 1196 (Ind.2001). 10. Beer argues that "[t]he search warrant in this case must fail because the officers failed to establish probable cause on the no......
-
Baker v. State
...improperly joined several alternative crimes); Castillo v. State, 734 N.E.2d 299, 304 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), summarily aff'd on trans. 741 N.E.2d 1196 (Ind.2001) (vacating defendant's conviction on grounds that jury's verdict may not have been unanimous because “the State chose to charge Castil......
-
Williams v. State
...Castillo v. State (2000) Ind.App., 734 N.E.2d 299, 303 (quoting Richardson, 717 N.E.2d at 53), reh'g denied, [summarily aff'd, 741 N.E.2d 1196 (Ind.2001)]. The "`defendant must demonstrate a reasonable possibility that the evidentiary facts used by the fact-finder to establish the essential......