Black v. Black

Docket NumberS12F1502
Decision Date25 March 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • In re Estate of Pond
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 27, 2016
    ...accord Dozier v. Baker , 283 Ga. 543, 544, 661 S.E.2d 543 (2008).12 See supra note 8 & accompanying text; see also Black v. Black , 292 Ga. 691, 692–93, 740 S.E.2d 613 (2013) (explaining that “to show ... domicile, the petitioner must prove that he maintained actual residence in Georgia dur......
  • Jackson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 25, 2013
  • Zekser v. Zekser
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 17, 2013
    ...necessarily an equal division, but a fair one. Driver v. Driver, 292 Ga. 800(2), 741 S.E.2d 631 (2013). See also Black v. Black, 292 Ga. 691, 695(3), 740 S.E.2d 613 (2013); Pennington v. Pennington, 291 Ga. 165, 168(4)(a), 728 S.E.2d 230 (2012). When determining the division of marital prop......
  • Fladger v. Fladger
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 3, 2014
    ...application to review that issue and that the evidence in the record appears to support such a deviation. See Black v. Black, 292 Ga. 691, 697, 740 S.E.2d 613 (2013) (explaining that we “ ‘review the decision to deviate, or not to deviate, from the presumptive amount of child support under ......
  • Get Started for Free