Blackburn for Blackburn v. Taylor
| Decision Date | 12 September 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-2506,89-2506 |
| Citation | 566 So.2d 915 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | Wendy Dawn BLACKBURN for Lloyd E. BLACKBURN (deceased), Appellant, v. David TAYLOR and Arrow Trucking & Land Dev., Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Appellees. |
Brian O. Sutter, Port Charlotte, Bill McCabe, of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for appellant.
Gerald W. Pierce, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellees.
Wendy Dawn Blackburn contests an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying worker's compensation death benefits. The JCC found that she failed to establish by competent substantial evidence that she was living apart from the claimant for justifiable cause, and that she was substantially financially dependent upon him for support at the time of his death. Blackburn argues on appeal that she met her evidentiary burden, and that the JCC erred in rejecting her testimony for lack of credibility absent an adequate explanation for such a finding. We agree and reverse.
All testimony adduced before the JCC was submitted by deposition. This court is therefore in as good a position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses and weigh the evidence as the JCC. See, e.g., Mendivil v. Tampa Envelope Manufacturing Co., 233 So.2d 5, 6 (Fla.1970); Lerman v. Broward Cty. Bd. of Com'rs, 555 So.2d 419, 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Sanlando Utility Corp. v. Morris, 418 So.2d 389, 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Haga v. Clay Hyder Trucking Lines, 397 So.2d 428, 431 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 402 So.2d 609 (Fla.1981); Morrison Merchandising Corp. v. Rambeau, 377 So.2d 234, 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); cert. denied, 386 So.2d 640 (Fla.1980). Our review of the record clearly shows that the claimant met her burden of proof by competent substantial evidence.
Section 440.16(1)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987) allows for the payment of death benefits to "the following persons ... on account of dependency upon the deceased, and in the following order of preference ...: (1) To the spouse if there is no child, 50 percent of the average weekly wage, such compensation to cease upon the spouse's death or remarriage...." (Emphasis Supplied). Spouse is defined as "only a spouse ... substantially dependent upon the decedent for financial support and living apart at [the time of the decedent's death or injury] for justifiable cause." Section 440.02(19), Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.). Therefore, before a spouse living apart may recover dependency benefits, such spouse must produce competent evidence of substantial dependence on the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hall v. MAAL
...spousal communications, wrongful death, workers' compensation claims, and social security benefits. See, e.g., Blackburn for Blackburn v. Taylor, 566 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (holding that claimant was a surviving spouse of the deceased and thus entitled to workers' compensation death ......
-
Morales v. Zenith Ins. Co.
...440.16, Fla. Stat. Surviving spouses, like Ms. Morales, may make a claim for the available statutory benefits. See Blackburn v. Taylor, 566 So.2d 915, 916 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (recognizing that a “surviving spouse” of a deceased employee is entitled to claim workers' compensation benefits). ......
-
Stewart v. Tampa Maid Sea Products, 92-4364
...weighing medical testimony given by deposition. Hubbell v. Triple J of Lee County, 590 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA1992); Blackburn v. Taylor, 566 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 577 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990); Hidden Harbor Boatworks v. Williams, 566 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st ...
-
Power Plant Maintenance v. Mercado
...By the definitions set forth in the statute and the applicable case law, the claimant did not have any dependents. In Blackburn v. Taylor, 566 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), we explained that a spouse living apart from the employee may not recover dependency benefits without first producing......