Blackledge v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., Inc.

Decision Date28 September 1976
Docket NumberNos. 76-1210,s. 76-1210
PartiesMildred BLACKLEDGE, Administratrix of the Estates of Barbara A. Blackledge, Brian E. Blackledge, and Dennis D. Blackledge, Deceased, and guardian of Dennis E. Blackledge, minor, Appellant, v. MARTIN K. EBY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a corporation, Appellee. to 76-1213.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Philip M. Kneifl and Charles O. Forrest, Kneifl, Kneifl & Forrest, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

Thomas J. Walsh, Walsh, Walentine & Miles, Omaha, Neb., for appellee.

Before LAY, ROSS and WEBSTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals, brought by Mildred Blackledge, plaintiff below, arise out of four consolidated diversity actions seeking damages for wrongful death and personal injuries. In each case, judgment was entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Martin K. Eby Construction Co. We affirm.

In the early morning hours of June 8, 1974, an automobile driven by Dennis D. Blackledge plunged into an excavation and overturned. The excavation, which had been dug by the Eby Construction Co., encompassed a portion of the usual driving surface of Abbot Drive in Douglas County, Nebraska. A detour had been constructed, directing traffic around the excavation. Riding in the car at the time of the accident were Blackledge's wife, his two sons, and one Kevin O'Connor. The party had been attending a drive-in movie. All of the occupants of the vehicle were killed with the exception of one of the Blackledge sons, who was injured.

As guardian of the surviving Blackledge son and administratrix of the estates of the three deceased Blackledges, Mildred Blackledge commenced four diversity actions against the Eby Construction Co., seeking damages for wrongful death and personal injuries. The asserted basis for recovery in all four actions was negligence.

Trial was had to a jury beginning on January 27, 1976. Verdicts were returned in favor of Eby in all four cases and judgments were entered accordingly. Mildred Blackledge appealed. The sole contention raised on appeal is that the district court erred in admitting, over appellant's objection, medical testimony relating to the alcohol content of Dennis Blackledge's blood at the time of the accident. The testimony indicated that Blackledge's blood contained 0.17% alcohol, and that such a concentration would likely impair one's driving ability. Appellant contends that certain Nebraska statutes render such evidence inadmissible.

The statutory provisions upon which appellant relies are Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 39-6,104.06; 39-6,104.07; and 39-6,104.10 (1974 Cum.Supp.). Section 39-6,104.06 provides:

Any coroner or other official performing the duties of coroner shall report in writing to the Department of Motor Vehicles the death of any person within his jurisdiction as the result of an accident involving a motor vehicle and the circumstances of such accident. Such report by the coroner shall be made within ten days after such death.

Section 39-6,104.07 provides:

In the case of a driver who dies within four hours after being in a motor vehicle accident, and of a pedestrian sixteen years of age or older who dies within four hours after being struck by a motor vehicle, the coroner or other official performing the duties of coroner shall examine the body and cause such tests to be made as are necessary to determine the presence and percentage concentration of alcohol or drugs therein. Such information shall be included in each report submitted pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-6,104.06 to 39-6,104.12...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Martinolich v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • October 12, 1988
    ...of a vehicle dies within four hours of a motor vehicle accident. Neb.Rev.Stat. Sec. 39-6, 104.07; Blackledge v. Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc., 542 F.2d 474, 475 (8th Cir.1976). The statute required the coroner, in such an instance, to test for and determine the percentage of alco......
  • Warner v. Transamerica Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • July 25, 1984
    ...though questions such as burden of proof, presumptions, and privileges may be matters of state law, see Blackledge v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., 542 F.2d 474, 476 n. 1 (8th Cir.1976); Lynch v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 452 F.2d 1065, 1068 n. 2 (8th Cir.1972); FRE 601, 501, 302, in general, is......
  • State v. Jacobitz, No. A-06-824 (Neb. App. 2/27/2007)
    • United States
    • Nebraska Court of Appeals
    • February 27, 2007
    ...not err in determining that the results of the first blood test must be suppressed. The State also cites to Blackledge v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., Inc., 542 F.2d 474 (8th Cir. 1976), in support of its argument that evidence of Jacobitz' blood alcohol content is admissible. However, the cou......
  • Farmers Ins. Co. v. Stanton
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • January 2, 2019
    ...the insurer/insured relationship and its similarity to the attorney/client relationship"). See also Blackledge v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., Inc., 542 F.2d 474, 476 n.1 (8th Cir. 1976) (citing Federal Rule of Evidence 501) ("Privileges created by state law are, of course, applicable in a div......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Trial Evidence Foundations - 2016 Contents
    • July 31, 2016
    ..., 444 US. 873 (1979). The federal law of privileges will control a federal criminal case. Blackledge v. Martin Kebey Construction Co. , 542 F.2d 474 (8th Cir. 1976). Under Federal Rule 501, the privilege of a witness, person, government, state or political subdivision shall be determined in......
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Trial Evidence Foundations - 2017 Contents
    • July 31, 2017
    ..., 444 US. 873 (1979). The federal law of privileges will control a federal criminal case. Blackledge v. Martin Kebey Construction Co. , 542 F.2d 474 (8th Cir. 1976). Under Federal Rule 501, the privilege of a witness, person, government, state or political subdivision shall be determined in......
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Trial Evidence Foundations - 2018 Contents
    • July 31, 2018
    ..., 444 US. 873 (1979). The federal law of privileges will control a federal criminal case. Blackledge v. Martin Kebey Construction Co. , 542 F.2d 474 (8th Cir. 1976). Under Federal Rule 501, the privilege of a witness, person, government, state or political subdivision shall be determined in......
  • Privileges
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Trial Evidence Foundations - 2014 Contents
    • July 31, 2014
    ..., 444 US. 873 (1979). The federal law of privileges will control a federal criminal case. Blackledge v. Martin Kebey Construction Co. , 542 F.2d 474 (8th Cir. 1976). Under Federal Rule 501, the privilege of a witness, person, government, state or political subdivision shall be determined in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT