Blackman v. City of Big Sandy, Texas, 4
| Decision Date | 07 February 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 74-3021,No. 4,L,4,74-3021 |
| Citation | 507 F.2d 935 |
| Parties | Clint C. BLACKMAN, Jr., E. B. Yale and Thrifty-Mantd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF BIG SANDY, TEXAS, and Steve Prociw, et al., etc., Defendants-Appellees. Summary Calender.* *Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part 1. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Earl Roberts, Jr., Longview, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Lowell C. Holt, Gilmer, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
On June 1, 1971, Big Sandy, Texas went 'wet,' as the voters of the City chose to legalize the sale of beer and alcoholic beverages within the corporate limits of the City. Two of the appellants purchased land along U.S. Highway 80, and constructed a small self-service gasoline station, which they subsequently leased to a third appellant. Apparently one of the purposes in constructing the station was to acquire a license to sell beer at the location, and soon after completing construction, appellants applied for a permit to sell beer.
The service station was directly across the street from a church, however, and a license could not be secured as the City had passed an ordinance prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages within 300 feet of any church. See Vernon's Texas Code Ann., Penal Code Art. 666-25a. Appellants then arranged to have their building winched backwards away from the street and the church, until it came to rest a few feet outside the zone of prohibition. Before a permit was issued, the City then passed a comprehensive zoning ordinance classifying a portion of the City as a class 'B' residential district in which the sale of intoxicating beverages was prohibited. This ordinance was passed under the authority of Vernon's Texas Code Ann., Penal Code Art. 667-10 1/2, which provides that 'cities and towns may also designate certain zones in the residential section or sections of said cities and towns . . . where such sales (of beer) may be prohibited.' No business establishment, including appellants', was retroactively affected. The ordinance did not affect the preexisting commercial uses in the area so zoned, except that no business will be permitted to sell intoxicating beverages. Appellants contend that this action denies them an expected $500 a month profit, and note that other businesses in other areas are not so affected. Contending the City's action is arbitrary, discriminatory and confiscatory, appellants assert the zoning ordinance is unconstitutional as applied.
This Court has noted previously that our review of zoning decisions is limited, and that in cases challenging the propriety of property classifications 'the only question which federal district courts may...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
6th Camden Corp. v. Evesham Tp., Burlington Cty.
...v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 7 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 837, 95 S.Ct. 66, 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974); Blackman v. City of Big Sandy, 507 F.2d 935, 936 (5th Cir. 1975); City of St. Paul v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co., 413 F.2d 762, 766-67 (8th Cir.), cert. deni......
-
Shelton v. City of College Station
...track when turning from a frontal attack on an ordinance or plan itself to a specific zoning decision. See Blackman v. City of Big Sandy, 507 F.2d 935, 936 (5th Cir.1975); South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 7 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 837, 95 S.Ct. 66, 42 L.Ed.......
-
Appling County v. Municipal Elec. Authority of Georgia
...discrimination. 2 A strikingly similar case is Blackman v. City of Big Sandy, Texas, 377 F.Supp. 771 (E.D.Tex.1974), aff'd, 507 F.2d 935 (5th Cir. 1975). In that case, the owners of a service station challenged on Constitutional grounds a zoning ordinance which prohibited the sale of alcoho......
-
Arno v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission
...local zoning ordinances prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors within certain areas have been upheld. In Blackman v. Big Sandy, Tex., 507 F.2d 935, 936-937 (5th Cir. 1975), the court stated: "The City might be legitimately concerned about the presence of a liquor establishment and its......
-
FEDERAL COURTS AND TAKINGS LITIGATION.
...against an ordinance that restricted building height on property that the railroad intended to sell); Blackman v. City of Big Sandy, 507 F.2d 935, 936-37 (5th Cir. 1975) (rejecting on the merits a challenge to a zoning ordinance that entailed that a gas station would not be able to sell bee......