Blackshear v. United States, 14139.
| Decision Date | 20 February 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 14139.,14139. |
| Citation | 102 US App. DC 289,252 F.2d 853 |
| Parties | Albert E. BLACKSHEAR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Mr. Dayton M. Harrington, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. James D. Graham, Jr., Washington, D. C. (both appointed by this Court) was on the brief for appellant.
Mr. Harold D. Rhynedance, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee. Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Messrs. Arthur J. McLaughlin, and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief for appellee.
Before PRETTYMAN, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied March 18, 1958.
Blackshear was convicted of robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. On appeal he argues that his arrest was illegal and that the decision of the Supreme Court in the Mallory case1 precluded the admission of certain statements which he made.
2 The statements made were in the nature of an alibi. Conviction evidently rested on other evidence, chiefly that of the victim.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Lewis
...82 S.Ct. 1145, 8 L.Ed.2d 277 (1962); Sims v. United States, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 294, 277 F.2d 93 (1960); Blackshear v. United States, 102 U.S. App.D.C. 289, 290, 252 F.2d 853, 854 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1004, 79 S.Ct. 1144, 3 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1959); Lawson v. United States, 101 U.S.App.D.......
-
United States v. Ladson
...failure of his counsel to make an objection at a time when the necessary determination of fact could be made. Blackshear v. United States, 1958, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 289, 252 F.2d 853, certiorari denied, 1959, 359 U.S. 1004, 79 S.Ct. 1144, 3 L.Ed.2d 1033; Lawson v. United States, 1957, 101 U.S.......
-
Howell v. United States, 67 C 640.
...56 S.Ct. 391, 392, 80 L.Ed. 555." United States v. Jones, 204 F.2d 745, 748-749 (7th Cir. 1953). Accord, Blackshear v. United States, 102 U.S. App.D.C. 289, 252 F.2d 853 (1958); United States v. Vasen, 222 F.2d 3 (7th Cir. 1955); United States v. Childress, 347 F.2d 448 (7th Cir. 1965); cf.......
-
Leigh v. United States
...238, 240, 314 F.2d 243, 245 (1962); Williams v. United States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 308 F.2d 652 (1962); Blackshear v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 289, 252 F.2d 853 (1958). See Lawson v. United States, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 332, 248 F.2d 654 (1957). In view of these opinions, it may be that......