Blackwelder v. Collins, 13752
Decision Date | 20 February 1958 |
Docket Number | 13973.,No. 13752,13753,13972,13752 |
Citation | 102 US App. DC 290,252 F.2d 854 |
Parties | Leroy J. BLACKWELDER, Appellant, v. Linton M. COLLINS, Collector of the Estate of Frederick A. Sterling, Deceased, Appellee. P. David STERLING, Appellant, v. Linton M. COLLINS, Collector of the Estate of Frederick A. Sterling, Deceased, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Mr. Mark P. Friedlander, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Samuel L. Mensh, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
These cases involve a family dispute over the assets of Frederick A. Sterling, the details of which need not be recited here. In Nos. 13,752 and 13,753, the controversy turns on a power of attorney given by Frederick A. Sterling on August 10, 1956, to appellant P. David Sterling. The District Court found that Frederick A. Sterling was on that date not mentally competent to execute the power of attorney. On the basis of that finding, which we cannot say on the record before us is clearly erroneous, we affirm the judgments in No. 13,752 and No. 13,753, both entered on January 9, 1957.
In the contempt cases, Nos. 13,972 and 13,973, both orders directed imprisonment for failure to pay to the conservator of the property of Frederick A. Sterling, or into the registry of the court, "the sum of $57,009.62," as directed in the judgments (here affirmed) in Nos. 13,752 and 13,753. Those judgments do not require the payment of any specifically identified or identifiable money, and would be satisfied by the payment of the amount in legal tender from any source. Section 11-326 of the District of Columbia Code forbids imprisonment for contempt of a decree which "only directs the payment of money" except in cases where imprisonment is "especially provided for." Cf. Lundregan v. Lundregan, 102 U.S.App. D.C. ___, 252 F.2d 823 (1958). Appellees point to no statute providing for imprisonment in circumstances like the present. In No. 13,972 the part of the order adjudicating appellant Black-welder in contempt for not paying the sum of $57,009.62 is affirmed, but to the extent that the order directs his imprisonment it must be reversed for the reason just given. Our reversal is without prejudice to an application, upon proper showing, to amend the judgment entered January 9,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. Braddick
...U.S. 931, 97 S.Ct. 1550, 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977); Blackwelder v. Crooks, 151 F.Supp. 26 (D.D.C.1957), Rev'd on other grounds, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 290, 252 F.2d 854 (1958). Although U. S. v. Roundtree, 420 F.2d 845, 853 (CA5, 1969), seems to say broadly that contempt may not be imposed as a sanct......
-
American President Lines, Inc., In re
...n. 1, 364 F.2d 692, 693 n. 1 (1966); Blackwelder v. Crooks, 151 F.Supp. 26, 28 (D.D.C.1957), rev'd on other grounds, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 290, 291, 252 F.2d 854, 855 (1958); 7 J. Moore, Moore's Federal Practice p 62.06 (2d ed. 1985).31 See, e.g., Federal Prescription Serv., Inc. v. American Pha......
- United States v. Lewis
-
Seven Arts Pictures, Inc. v. Jonesfilm
...$0.00 in the garnishees accounts does not relieve a party of their duty to comply with an Order of the Court. See Blackwelder v. Collins, 252 F.2d 854, 855 (D.C. Cir. 1958) ("judgments do not require the payment of any specifically identified or identifiable money, and would be satisfied by......