Blackwell v. State
Citation | 99 So. 49,19 Ala.App. 553 |
Decision Date | 22 January 1924 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 372. |
Parties | BLACKWELL v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; Ernest Lacy, Judge.
Habeas corpus proceeding by Oliver Blackwell. From a judgment denying the writ, petitioner appeals. Reversed and rendered.
J. B Powell, of Jasper, for appellant.
Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and O. B. Cornelius, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.
The petitioner, Oliver Blackwell, was convicted for the offense of manslaughter in the second degree, in the circuit court of Walker county. Judgment of conviction was pronounced against him on November 30, 1920, and by such judgment he was duly sentenced to confinement in the county jail for 12 months. In addition to the term of imprisonment in the county jail he was sentenced to hard labor for the county for 70 days, in default of payment of the fine of $200 assessed by the jury the judgment providing that the sentence to hard labor for the fine should begin at the expiration of the jail sentence of 12 months. He was also sentenced to hard labor for the county for 256 days to pay the costs. From the judgment of conviction he appealed to this court, and the appeal was here dismissed on January 10, 1922. On the 10th day of March 1922, the defendant was placed in the county jail of Walker county and began serving his 12 months' sentence on that date. He served such jail sentence continuously until March 9, 1923, on which date the jail sentence imposed by the court terminated. On that date the petitioner paid in cash to the clerk of the court the sum of $234.15, and upon payment of this amount he was discharged from the jail and was released from the custody of the sheriff; it appearing that the petitioner, the sheriff, and the clerk were all of the impression that by serving the full jail sentence of 12 months and by the payment of the above sum of $234.15 he was entitled to his release from further custody, and, as stated, he was discharged. Several weeks after the petitioner had been thus discharged from custody the clerk of the court issued an alias writ of arrest on the original indictment, as follows:
This alias writ of arrest was executed by the sheriff on May 11, 1923, by arresting the petitioner and placing him in jail on that day, where he is still confined, so far as this record shows; all costs of the proceedings having been paid in cash by defendant to the clerk of the court, as he had a right to do under the terms of section 7635 of the Code of 1907, the date upon which his entire term of imprisonment in the jail and hard labor for the county expired by operation of law and the judgment pronounced, on May 18, 1923.
On May 19, 1923, the prisoner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus addressed "To the Honorable Judges of the Circuit Court of Walker County, Alabama," in which he sets up that he is imprisoned in the county jail of Walker county, Ala., by Guy...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Libtz v. Coleman
... ... 821, the ... defendant was sentenced to serve 30 days. He entered upon the ... sentence. Before serving same, the sheriff released him for a ... period of 55 days and then recommitted him. The Oklahoma ... court held the sentence executed. This conclusion is ... sustained by Blackwell v. State, 19 Ala.App. 553, 99 ... So. 49; Thomas v. State, 25 Ala.App. 576, 151 So ... 473; White v. Pearlman, 10 Cir., 42 F.2d 788 ... This case is ... distinguished from Terrell v. Wiggins, 55 Fla. 596, ... 46 So. 727, 127 Am.St.Rep. 196 and State v. Horne, ... 52 Fla. 125, [149 ... ...
- Davis v. State
-
Ex parte Hutchinson
...494, 27 So.2d 237; Blakely v. State, 28 Ala.App. 574, 190 So. 102; Gardner v. State, 21 Ala.App. 388, 108 So. 635; Blackwell v. State, 19 Ala.App. 553, 99 So. 49; State ex rel. Curtis v. Heflin, 19 Ala.App. 222, 96 So. We have carefully examined these cases and do not consider them apt in t......
-
Ex parte Agee
...585, 587-588 (1973), whose pertinent part we quote: "Appellant relies on King v. State, 16 Ala.App. 118, 75 So. 710; Blackwell v. State, 19 Ala.App. 553, 99 So. 49. In King the petitioner had been convicted of grand larceny and was sentenced to thirteen months in the State Penitentiary. On ......