Blanco v. United States, 12508.
| Decision Date | 17 August 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 12508.,12508. |
| Citation | 184 F.2d 117 |
| Parties | BLANCO v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
L. Charles Gay, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.
This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.C.A. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F. 2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. State of Arizona
...149 F.2d 850, 851; Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117; Blanco v. United States, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117; Newman v. State of California, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 515; Newman v. State of California, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 392, 393; Weldon v. U......
- Richardson v. United States
-
Fern v. United States, 13633.
...complaint was filed. 4 Such an order is not an appealable final decision. See Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117; Blanco v. United States, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117; Newman v. State of California, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 515; Monge v. Smyth, 9 Cir., 198 F.2d 1 In the main, Rule 60(b) states old and ......
- Schwertfeger v. Constant, 975