Blanks v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Decision Date | 07 April 1903 |
Docket Number | 1,197. |
Citation | 122 F. 849 |
Parties | BLANKS et al. v. FARMERS; LOAN & TRUST CO., et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
E. T Lamkin and W. F. Millsaps, for appellants.
E. B Kruttschnitt, E. H. Farrar, B. F. Jonas, and Harry H. Hall for appellees.
This controversy grows out of the cause entitled 'The Farmers' Loan & Trust Company, Trustee, Complainant vs. The Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad Company et al., Defendants,' No. 216 of the docket of the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Louisiana, the style being the result of an order of consolidation of the several causes numbered 215, 216, and 217 of the docket, in equity. The common object of these causes was the foreclosure of certain mortgages upon the property of the Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad Company, securing two several bond issues, and incidentally for the appointment of a receiver. The attitude of the appellants here was originally that of interveners, but under the order of consolidation they were made to stand as defendants. On October 7, 1901, there was a decree of foreclosure as to the granted lands of the defendant company, and, the cause having been retained for that purpose, there was a further amendatory order on December 7, 1901. Pursuant to this decree, there was a sale, on February 1, 1902, of the granted lands, comprising selections certified and uncertified, reserved mineral rights, funds unappropriated arising from sales of lands, notes for the purchase price of certain other sales, and other notes for rents, etc. At this sale, Cyril C. Harvey, 'for account of himself and associates' became the purchaser of all the property, for the aggregate sum of $115,900. On February 28 and on March 4, 1902, respectively, Robert B. Blanks, and Mrs. Fannie K. Newman, surviving partner in community and testamentary executrix of Charles Newman, deceased, filed exceptions to the master's report, opposing the confirmation of the sale, and charging various irregularities in the conduct of the same, as well as that the price at which the property was sold was grossly inadequate. Upon the issues created by the answer of the defendant company, and 'C. C. Harvey, representing bondholders purchaser,' the matter was heard at chambers in the city of New Orleans, by consent of counsel, on April 17, 1902, when the following decretal order was passed:
On May 14, 1902, was passed the following decree confirming the sale: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morrison v. Burnette
... ... [154 F. 624] ... In ... Blanks v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 59 C.C.A. 59, ... 122 F. 849, we find that ... ...
-
In re Receivership of Great Western Beet Sugar Co.
... ... Savings Bank, 1 Neb. (Unof.) 449, 96 N.W. 230; ... Nebraska Loan & Trust Co. v. Hamer, 40 Neb. 281, 85 ... N.W. 695; Patterson v ... Reeder, 3 Ohio Dec. 109; ... Atcheson v. Hutchison, 51 Tex. 223; Blanks v ... Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 122 F. 849, 59 C.C.A ... The ... ...
-
Armstrong v. Csurilla, 19041
...the fairness of the transaction, as a cause for vacating it * * *." Id. at 649, 110 P. at 861 (quoting Blanks v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 122 F. 849, 851 (5th Cir.1903), and Schroeder v. Young, 161 U.S. 334, 337-38, 16 S.Ct. 512, 513, 40 L.Ed. 721 (1896)) (citations omitted); see also Cit......
-
Baltimore Trust Co. v. Interocean Oil Co.
...v. Schindler, certiorari denied, 279 U.S. 850, 49 S.Ct. 347, 73 L.Ed. 993; Morrison v. Burnette, 8 Cir., 154 F. 617; Blanks v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 5 Cir., 122 F. 849 (where again the advanced bid was 20% greater than the price bid); Investment Registry v. Chicago & M. E. R. Co., 7 Ci......