Blanton v. State
Citation | 886 So.2d 850 |
Parties | Thomas Edwin BLANTON, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama. |
Decision Date | 29 August 2003 |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
John Charles Robbins, Birmingham, for appellant.
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Joseph G.L. Marston III, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
In 2001, the appellant, Thomas Edwin Blanton, Jr., was convicted of four counts of first-degree murder, a violation of Title 14, § 314, Ala.Code 1940 (Recomp.1958), and his punishment was fixed at imprisonment for life on each conviction. The appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which the trial court denied after conducting a hearing. This appeal followed.
The evidence showed that, in 1963, the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham was frequently used in connection with the civil rights movement. On September 15, 1963, a bomb exploded near or under some steps at the church. As a result of the explosion, four young black girls — 11-year-old Carol Denise McNair, 14-year-old Addie Mae Collins, 14-year-old Cynthia Wesley, and 14-year-old Carole Robertson — who were in the basement preparing for a church service were killed.
The appellant's first argument is that the trial court erred when it allowed his former girlfriend to testify about his alleged prior bad acts toward and comments about black people. At trial, Waylene Vaughn Wise, who dated the appellant in the early 1960s, testified about the following acts that occurred in approximately late 1962 and early 1963:
First, the appellant contends that Wise's testimony was not admissible pursuant to Rule 404(b), Ala. R. Evid., which provides, in pertinent part:
We addressed a contention similar to the appellant's in Chambliss v. State, 373 So.2d 1185, 1207-08 (Ala.Crim.App.1979), as follows:
We also addressed a similar contention in Stoner v. State, 418 So.2d 171, 183 (Ala.Crim.App.1982), as follows:
(Emphasis added.)
Likewise, in this case, Wise's testimony about the appellant's prior acts toward and comments about black people was relevant to show his motive for bombing the church. Therefore, Wise's testimony was admissible pursuant to Rule 404(b), Ala. R. Evid.
Second, the appellant contends that the prejudicial effect of Wise's testimony substantially outweighed its probative value and that the testimony should have been excluded pursuant to Rule 403, Ala. R. Evid. Specifically, he asserts that Wise never reported the acts about which she testified to law enforcement authorities; he was never questioned about, arrested for, or charged with any of the acts; and Wise's testimony was not corroborated. However, such concerns would affect only the weight the jury gave the testimony and not its admissibility. Further, the testimony about his prior acts and comments had an extremely high probative value for the reasons set forth previously. Finally, the trial court gave the following limiting instruction during its oral charge:
(R. 1879-80.) Therefore, the probative value of Wise's testimony was not substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect.
The appellant's second argument is that the trial court improperly admitted a recording of a June 28, 1964, conversation between him and his wife. On the recording, the appellant makes references to a meeting about making a bomb and being at the Modern Sign Shop to make a bomb.
In May 1964, John Colvin, who was an electronic technician for the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"), rented an apartment in the house where the appellant lived. His apartment shared a common wall with the appellant's kitchen. In June, he and Special Agent Ralph Butler installed some electronic equipment in his closet.
During the State's direct examination of Butler, the following occurred:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Blackmon v. State
...ordered, adjudged and decreed that defendant's motion for a change of venue is hereby denied." (C.R. 194-95.) In Blanton v. State, 886 So.2d 850, 876-77 (Ala.Crim.App.2003), we stated the following concerning a circuit court's ruling on a motion for a change of "`"A trial court is in a bett......
-
Lane v. State
...hold the State to a higher burden of proof is a race-neutral reason for striking that veniremember.’ " (quoting Blanton v. State, 886 So. 2d 850, 874 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003), cert. denied, 886 So. 2d 886 (Ala. 2004), cert. denied, Blanton v. Alabama, 543 U.S. 878, 125 S.Ct. 119, 160 L.Ed.2d ......
-
Cherry v. State, CR-02-0374.
...So.2d 1185 (Ala.Crim.App.1979). In 2001, Thomas Edwin Blanton was convicted of murder for his involvement the bombing. Blanton v. State, 886 So.2d 850 (Ala.Crim.App.2003). During the May 2000 session of the Jefferson County grand jury, Bobby Frank Cherry was indicted for the murders of Caro......
-
Martin v. State
...from pretrial publicity related to the facts of the case to be tried is a race-neutral reason for a strike.’ ” Blanton v. State, 886 So.2d 850, 874 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) (quoting Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4, 20 (Ala.Crim.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995)). Martin argues, however, t......
-
GOOGLING A MISTRIAL: ONLINE JUROR MISCONDUCT IN ALABAMA.
...2021). (48 )Id. at *l. (49 )Id. (50 )Id at *9. (51) Id (52 )Id. at* 11-12. (53) Young, 2021 WL 3464152, at *10 (quoting Blanton v. State, 886 So. 2d 850, 877 (Ala. Crim. App. (54) Id. at *11. (55) Id. at *10 (quoting Sale v. State, 8 So. 3d 330, 342 (Ala. Crim. App. 2008)). (56) Id. (57) Id......