Bleight v. Bank

Decision Date26 March 1848
Citation10 Pa. 131
PartiesBLEIGHT <I>v.</I> The MANUFACTURERS' AND MECHANICS' BANK.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Bleight, for plaintiff in error.—The conveyance worked a conversion, by reason of the direction to sell, and the right of the grantors was confined to the proceeds of the land, and was not the subject of a mortgage, or, at least, not of a sheriff's sale: 2 R. 185; 4 Ib. 242. The deed is badly worded; but that a sale is imperative, is seen from the fact that a sale, either before or after the death of the annuitant, is directed, for no division is directed but of the proceeds. They are to be divided after her death, if not sold before, which plainly implies the land shall be sold before or after.

O. Thompson, contrà.—There is no express direction to sell; but a mere power to raise sufficient to pay the annuity. After that ceased, there was, at most, a mere authority by implication; and, as it has not been exercised, there is nothing to debar the plaintiffs from having their purpart set out to them. It is settled that, to work a conversion by a power to sell, it must be a positive direction: Leigh and Dalz on Conv. 15; 2 Vern. 227; 2 Ves. Jr. 170, 185: that is, it must be in the nature of a trust. A discretionary power never works a conversion until it is exercised: Wright v. Trustees, 1 Hoff. 203-19; 2 Rand. 120. The language of the deed can only refer to a sale during the life of the annuitant; "surplus interest" could not exist after the annuity had ceased.

March 26. ROGERS, J.

It is by no means clear that the deed of trust was intended for any other purpose than to secure the payment of the annuity of Elizabeth Dunlap, under the will of her late husband. If granted for this special purpose, on the death of the annuitant the power to sell ceases; for the cause of sale ceasing, the authority to sell must cease likewise: Smith v. Folwell, 1 Bin. 546. But be this as it may, was there a conversion of the real estate into personalty? In order to change real into personal estate, it is essential that the direction to convert be positive and explicit; that the will, if it be by will, or the deed, if it be by contract, decisively fix upon the land the quality of money: Symons v. Rutter, 2 Vern. 227; Walker v. Denne, 2 Ves. Jr. 170, 185. But this characteristic nowhere appears. The deed is not imperative that the land shall be sold. It contains nothing more than...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • In re Assigned Estate of Handy
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • July 15, 1897
    ... ... personalty as well as realty, therein differing from a ... mortgage, which was held to be a provisional election in ... Bailey v. Allegheny Bank, 104 Pa. 425. In the ... last-named case it also appears that all the other ... distributees under the will had united in an express ... Scholle, 113 N.Y. 261; Chamberlain v. Taylor, ... 105 N.Y. 194; Crawford v. Ford, 7 W.N.C. 532; ... McClure's App., 72 Pa. 414; Bleight v. Bank, 10 ... Pa. 131; King v. King, 13 R.I. 501; Jones v ... Caldwell, 97 Pa. 42; Lynch v. Dearth, 2 Penrose & ... Watts, 101; Winch's ... ...
  • In re Estate of Machemer
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1891
    ...on the ground that the will of Samuel Machemer worked a conversion of the real estate devised therein. The auditor, citing, Bleight v. M. & M. Bank, 10 Pa. 131; App., 13 Pa. 260; Anewalt's App., 42 Pa. 414; Swift's App., 87 Pa. 502, and Ranninger's Est., 8 Cent. R. 838, was of the opinion t......
  • Darlington v. Darlington
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1894
    ...41 N.J.L. 440; Chew v. Nicklin, 45 Pa. 84; Nagle's Ap., 13 Pa. 260; Sheridan v. Sheridan, 136 Pa. 14; Peterson's Ap., 88 Pa. 397; Bleight v. Bank, 10 Pa. 131; Brown v. 1 Rawle, 408; Cobel v. Cobel, 8 Pa. 342; 2 Wms. Exrs. 817; Anewalt's Ap., 42 Pa. 414; Henry v. McCloskey, 9 Watts, 145; Luf......
  • Reed v. Mellor
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1888
    ...guardian. 2. The will made an equitable conversion of the real estate: Roland v. Miller, 100 Pa. 47; Dundas's Appeal, 64 Pa. 325; Bleight v. Banks, 10 Pa. 131; and even that conversion might be avoided by all parties treating the devise as realty and waiving the sale which the will authoriz......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT