Bloombaum v. State
Decision Date | 15 March 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 152,152 |
Citation | 207 A.2d 651,237 Md. 663 |
Parties | Milton BLOOMBAUM v. STATE of Maryland. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Marvin Mandel, Baltimore, for appellant.
Richard M. Pollitt, Sp. Atty., Salisbury (Thomas B. Finan, Atty. Gen., Baltimore, Leonard T. Kardy and James F. Tomes, State's Atty. and Asst. State's Atty., respectively for Montgomery County, Rockville, on the brief), for appellee.
Before PRESCOTT, C. J., and HORNEY, SYBERT, OPPENHEIMER and BARNES, JJ.
Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, under Information 5619, of unlawfully having in his possession and under his control a narcotic drug, and unlawfully having a hypodermic syringe and needle in his possession for the purpose of unlawfully administering habit-forming drugs.
Represented here by experienced and able counsel, appellant concedes that if his arrest were legal, his conviction was justified.
The exact attack on the arrest is not explicitly pinpointed, but it apparently is a claim that police officers arrested appellant without an arrest warrant and without probable cause to believe that a felony had been committed and that he committed it; and the arrest was not for a misdemeanor committed in the officers'...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Nadolski v. State
...516, 206 A.2d 795 (1965). In any event, the arrest of appellant was lawful as he was arrested under a valid warrant. Bloombaum v. State, 237 Md. 663, 207 A.2d 651 (1965). Appellant contends that the warrant was invalid because facts presented to the issuing magistrate were not within the pe......
-
Arrests in Maryland
...Arrests in Maryland A. Arrests with an arrest warrant Police may arrest with an arrest warrant. Bloombaum v. State, 237 Md. 663, 663 (1965). Crim. Proc. § 2-103(b)(1), provides: "A police officer may arrest a person throughout the State without limitations as to jurisdiction if . . . a warr......