Bloomington v. Indus. Bd.

Decision Date21 December 1916
Docket NumberNo. 10918.,10918.
Citation276 Ill. 239,114 N.E. 517
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
PartiesBLOOMINGTON, D. & C. R. CO. v. INDUSTRIAL BOARD et al.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Error to Circuit Court, Macon County; William K. Whitfield, Judge.

Proceedings by John E. Patterson, administrator, to obtain compensation for the death of his intestate, Stavros Geanules, while employed by the Bloomington, Decatur & Champaign Railroad Company. Compensation was awarded by the Industrial Board, and the award quashed by the circuit court, and the claimant brings error. Affirmed.

Redmon, Hogan & Redmon, of Decatur, for plaintiff in error.

Charles C. Le Forgee and Thomas W. Samuels, both of Decatur, and George W. Black, of Peoria, for defendant in error.

DUNN, J.

This writ of error is prosecuted to reverse a judgment of the circuit court of Macon county quashing a decision of the Industrial Board awarding compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Laws 1913, p. 335), at the rate of $5 per week for 416 weeks, to the plaintiff in error for the death of his intestate, Stavros Geanules, who was killed on April 17, 1914, by an interurban car of the defendant in error. The court found that the deceased was not at the time of his injury in the employ of the reilroad company, and that the accident resulting in his death did not arise out of or in the course of his employment. If the record of the Industrial Board contains evidence fairly tending to show that the deceased was in the employ of the railroad company, and that the accident arose out of and in the course of his employment, the award should have been sustained, otherwise it was properly quashed.

The testimony showed that Harry Spinos, a Greek, who had been in this country about 3 1/2 years, working for railroad companies, and who had worked for the Bloomington, Decatur & Champaign Railroad Company the previous year, on April 16, 1914, in response to a request from Edward Eagan, the company's roadmaster, went from Decatur to Danville for the purpose of securing employment for himself and some other Greeks, of whom the deceased was one. Early the next morning he saw Eagan, who told him that he could use the men and gave him a pass to return to Decatur and another pass for himself and ten men from Decatur to Monticello. Eagan told him that he had a bunk car between Bement and Monticello, at a place called Clark Siding, and he would give the men $1.65 a day. He told Spinos to bring the men down in the regular car and go and live in the bunk car. This was on Friday, and the men were to go to work on Saturday or Monday. Spinos returned to Decatur and told the deceased the company wanted him to go to work and would give him $1.65 a day and a bunkhouse to live in. Spinos left...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Brauch v. Skinner Bros. Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • June 10, 1932
    ......J. L. 542; Bolos v. Trenton Fire Clay Co., 102 N. J. L. 479;. Angerstein's Workmen's Compensation Act of Ill., 1930. Edition; Bloomington, Decatur & Champaign Railroad v. Industrial Comm., 276 Ill. 239; Dambold v. Industrial Comm., 323 Ill. 377; Danville, Urbana & Champaign Railroad ......
  • Brauch v. Skinner Bros. Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • June 10, 1932
    ......542; Bolos v. Trenton Fire Clay Co., 102 N.J.L. 479; Angerstein's Workmen's Compensation Act of Ill., 1930 Edition; Bloomington, Decatur & Champaign Railroad v. Industrial Comm., 276 Ill. 239; Dambold v. Industrial Comm., 323 Ill. 377; Danville, Urbana & Champaign Railroad v. ......
  • F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Illinois
    • February 7, 1929
    ......Fairbank Co. v. Industrial Com., 285 Ill. 11, 120 N. E. 457; Dambold v. Industrial Com., supra; [333 Ill. 344]Bloomington, D. & C. R. Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 239,114 N. E. 939. There are numerous cases where it was held that compensation could not be recovered although the employé at the time of the accident was actually at work. The basis of these cases was that the accident did not arise out of and in the ......
  • Isaacson v. Northern Wholesale Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • August 16, 1940
    ...... accident did occur while he was engaged in his own pursuits;. * * *." (Italics ours). . .          In. Bloomington, D. & C. R. Co. v. Industrial Board et. al., 276 Ill. 239, 114 N.E. 517, the court likened the. reasoning of transportation the same as though a ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT