Blue Coal Corp., In re

Decision Date26 January 1993
Docket NumberNo. 92-7390,92-7390
Citation986 F.2d 687
PartiesBankr. L. Rep. P 75,175 In re BLUE COAL CORPORATION. Frank J. McDONNELL, Trustee for Blue Coal Corporation v. McCLELLAN REALTY CORP.; Luzerne County Tax Claim Bureau; Bureau of Warrior Run; Bureau of Sugar Notch; Anthracite Health and Welfare Fund; Greater Wilkes-Barre Industrial Fund; Commonwealth of PA; United States of America Anthracite Health and Welfare Fund, Appellant. . Submitted under Third Circuit Rule 12(6)
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Charles A. Shea, III, Shea, Shea & Caputo, Wilkes-Barre, PA, for appellant.

D. Alan Harris, Harris & Ruble, Chicago, IL, for appellee, Com. of PA.

Gary R. Allen, Gary D. Gray, Christine A. Grant, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for appellee, U.S.

Before: GREENBERG, ROTH, and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This is a dispute over the distribution of proceeds from a sale of real property formerly held by the debtor in this bankruptcy case, Blue Coal Corporation. On August 19, 1991, the bankruptcy court entered an order permitting the proposed sale of property to go forward free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, and further directing that proceeds from the sale be distributed to the Anthracite Health and Welfare Fund (the "Fund").

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the United States, which are creditors of Blue Coal, brought an appeal in the district court. The district court found that the bankruptcy court's order had followed from a settlement agreement between the trustee for Blue Coal and the Fund. Prior to entering its order, the bankruptcy court had rejected the Commonwealth's suggestion that such a settlement had occurred and that other creditors of the bankrupt estate should therefore receive notice of the settlement and an opportunity to object to its terms. In the bankruptcy court's view, because no settlement had been reached, other creditors were not entitled to notice and an opportunity to respond. The district court found otherwise, stating, "We are of the view that the totality of the circumstances evidences a settlement. Notice of the settlement agreement should have been sent to all of the creditors with an opportunity to be heard thereon." Consequently, by an order entered on June 26, 1992, the district court (1) vacated the portion of the bankruptcy court's order which had directed that the sale proceeds be paid to the Fund, (2) directed that the Fund continue to preserve the proceeds in an interest-bearing account (in accordance with a previous order of the district court) and (3) remanded the matter to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with the district court's opinion.

Rather than return to the bankruptcy court to participate in further proceedings, the Fund brought this appeal challenging the merits of the district court's decision and arguing that it was entitled to immediate possession of the sale proceeds. However, we will not reach those questions because we have...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Lopez, Matter of
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • June 27, 1997
    ...Cir.1991); In re Meyertech Corp., 831 F.2d 410, 414 (3d Cir.1987); In re Hammond, 27 F.3d 52, 55 n. 5 (3d Cir.1994); In re Blue Coal Corp., 986 F.2d 687, 689 (3d Cir.1993); In re Comer, 716 F.2d 168, 172 (3d Cir.1983); In re Bonner Mall Partnership, 2 F.3d 899, 904-05 (9th Cir.1993), cert. ......
  • Johnson v. New Jersey State Parole Board, Civil No. 00-1811 (JBS) (D. N.J. 6/5/2001)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • June 5, 2001
    ... ... 21, 27, 112 S. Ct. 358, 116 L. Ed. 2d 301 (1991); Hindes v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. , 137 F.3d, 165-66 (3d Cir. 1998). No such relief is sought in the present case ... 6. Neither ... ...
  • White v. Padilla
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • November 28, 2022
    ... ... true (even if doubtful in fact).” Id. (quoting ... Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 555 ... (2007)). “To survive a motion to dismiss, a ... ...
  • In re RTI Holding Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Delaware
    • October 27, 2021
    ... ... Cty. MH/MR , 183 F.3d 273, 277 (3d Cir. 1999) (quoting ... In re Blue Coal Corp. , 986 F.2d 687, 689 (3d Cir ... 1993)). A crucial element that bars a collateral ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT