Bly v. Mid-Century Ins., Co., MID-CENTURY
| Decision Date | 26 April 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 15636,MID-CENTURY,15636 |
| Citation | 101 Nev. 216,698 P.2d 877 |
| Parties | Timothy BLY, Appellant, v.INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. |
| Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Jimmie Chituras (Chituras) was the owner of a Kawasaki motorcycle which was insured under a policy issued by respondent Mid-Century Insurance Company (Mid-Century). Chituras entered into a sales agreement with appellant Timothy Bly (Bly) for the sale of the motorcycle and on March 26, 1982, Bly gave Chituras partial payment toward the total purchase price. At that time Bly received physical possession and control of the motorcycle. Chituras, however, did not execute the certificate of title and transfer document to Bly, as required by NRS 482.400(1). Instead, the certificate remained in Chituras's possession to secure the final payment due on April 30, 1982.
At the time the parties transferred possession of the motorcycle, it was agreed that Bly would obtain insurance on the vehicle. Bly applied for and was issued a policy by Northland Insurance Company. That policy provided uninsured motorist benefits in the sum of $15,000.00. On April 7, 1982, Chituras contacted respondent Mid-Century Insurance Company and requested that a new motorcycle be substituted in place of the Kawasaki motorcycle listed in his insurance policy. A change endorsement was issued, and Chituras's new motorcycle became the described vehicle under the policy. At the same time, Chituras applied for 30 days temporary coverage on the Kawasaki, which was then in the possession and control of Bly. Mid-Century granted temporary coverage on the motorcycle for one month for the flat fee of $18.00. Chituras never informed Mid-Century that he had already transferred possession of the Kawasaki to Bly.
On April 10, 1982, while driving the Kawasaki, Bly was involved in a motor vehicle accident with an uninsured motorist. His damages exceed the sum of $30,000.00. Bly was paid $15,000.00 in uninsured motorist benefits by Northland Insurance. He also submitted a claim to Mid-Century for uninsured motorist coverage under Chituras's policy, claiming that he was a permissive user of the Kawasaki. Once Mid-Century learned of the transfer of the motorcycle pursuant to the sales agreement, the $18.00 premium for the temporary policy was returned to Chituras and accepted by him. Mid-Century then denied the claim, contending that Bly was the actual owner of the vehicle, and, therefore, not covered as a permissive user.
A declaratory relief action was filed requesting a judicial determination of the rights of the parties. By respective motions for summary judgment Mid-Century sought a declaration that its policy did not apply, while Bly sought a declaration that it did. Mid-Century's motion for summary judgment was granted and that of Bly was denied. It is from this order that Bly appeals.
NRS Chapter 485 is entitled the "Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act." That act requires that an owner's motor vehicle liability policy:
[i]nsure the person named therein and any other person, as insured, using any such motor vehicle or motor vehicles with the express or implied permission of the named insured, against loss from the liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of such motor vehicle....
NRS 485.3091(2)(b). Such a provision is commonly known as the "omnibus" clause in liability insurance contracts. Vigoren v. Transnational Ins. Co., 86 Nev. 810, 482 P.2d 96 (1970) (Zenoff, J., dissenting). Id. at 814-15., 482 P.2d at 98.
In this case we address the liability of an insurance company, under an omnibus clause, for an accident which occurred while the vehicle was being driven by a conditional vendee of the insured. The district court found that Bly, as conditional vendee, could not recover under the omnibus clause of the Mid-Century policy. We agree.
NRS 482.085 defines "owner" for purposes of the Motor Vehicle Safety and Responsibility Act as:
a person who holds the legal title of a motor vehicle, or in event a motor vehicle is the subject of an agreement for the conditional sale or...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Sanders v. Sears-Page
-
Johnson v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PA, Case No. 09-2125 SC.
...of the motorcycle was the owner of the motorcycle, even though the seller did not execute the certificate of title. 101 Nev. 216, 698 P.2d 877, 879 (Nev. 1985). Here, the case for finding that Claudia Van Winkle is the owner of the 2002 GMC Sierra is even stronger because Claudia Van Winkle......
-
Barr v. Gaines
...true owner of a motor vehicle if a member of his immediate family operates his automobile with his permission. In Bly v. Mid-Century Ins., 101 Nev. 216, 698 P.2d 877 (1985), this court held that failure to comply with Nevada's registration statute does not invalidate a conditional sales tra......
-
Johnson v. Am. Cas. Co. Of Reading, 10-15263
...the conditional vendee may not recover under an insurance policy secured in the name of the original owner. See Bly v. Mid-Century Ins., Co., 101 Nev. 216 (1985). Claudia Van Winkle ("Claudia") testified that, because she paid off the remaining debt owed on the vehicle before it was due, sh......